Diapositiva 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Diapositiva 1

Description:

Title: Diapositiva 1 Last modified by: Valued Acer Customer Document presentation format: Presentazione su schermo (4:3) Other titles: Arial Lucida Sans Unicode Times ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: gastaldico
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Diapositiva 1


1
Quando la CRT-P può bastare?
Natale MARRAZZO Francesco SOLIMENE
2
European Heart Journal (2008) 29, 23882442
3
Introduction
  • CRT in NYHA function class IV
  • CRT in NYHA function class I
  • CRT in PERMANENT AFib
  • CRT in conventional PM INDICATION
  • CRT in RENAL FAILURE
  • CRT in ADVANCED AGE

4
CRT in NYHA function class III/IV
Impact of CRT therapy on morbidity
COMPANION
CARE-HF
5
CRT in NYHA function class III/IV
Impact of CRT therapy on mortality
COMPANION
CARE-HF
6
CRT in NYHA function class III/IV
Ambulatory patients in NYHA function class IV
COMPANION
Primary time to all-cause death or hospitalization
Secondary time to all-cause death
7
CRT in NYHA function class III/IV
Key issues
  • LV dilatation no longer required
  • Class IV patients should be ambulatory
  • Reasonable expectation of survival with good
    functional status for 1 y for CRT-D
  • Evidence is strongest for patients with typical
    LBBB
  • Similar level of evidence for CRT-P and CRT-D

8
CRT in NYHA function class I/II
Clinical evidence
MADIT CRT
9
CRT in NYHA function class I/II
Clinical evidence
REVERSE
10
CRT in NYHA function class I/II
Clinical evidence
REVERSE
11
CRT in NYHA function class I/II
NYHA I
MADIT-CRT
REVERSE
12
CRT in NYHA function class I/II
Device selection
  • In favour of implantation of CRT-D
  • Predominantly or exclusively implanted CRT-D
  • Younger age, lower comorbidity and longer life
    expectancy
  • In favour of implantation of CRT-P
  • Survival advantage with CRT-D was not shown
  • LVEF increase to gt 35 (NO ICD indication in HF)
  • Higher risk of device-related complications with
    CRT-D

13
CRT in NYHA function class I/II
Key issues
  • MADIT-CRT and REVERSE demonstrate reduced
    morbidity
  • In REVERSE and in MADIT-CRT NYHA I pts had been
    previously symptomatic
  • Improvement primarily seen in pts with QRS 150
    ms and/or typical LBBB.
  • In MADIT-CRT, women with LBBB demonstrated a
    particularly favourable response
  • Survival advantage not established
  • In MADIT-CRT the extent of reverse remodelling
    was concordant with and predictive of improvement
    in clinical outcomes

14
CRT and PERMANENT AFib
15
CRT and PERMANENT AFib
16
CRT and PERMANENT AFib
17
CRT and PERMANENT AFib
Key issues
  • Approximately one-fifth of CRT implantations in
    Europe are in
  • patients with permanent AF
  • NYHA class III/IV symptoms and an LVEF of 35
    are well-established indications for ICD
  • Frequent pacing is defined as 95 pacemaker
    dependency
  • Evidence is strongest for patients with an LBBB
    pattern
  • Insufficient evidence for mortality
    recommendation

18
CRT and a conventional PM INDICATION
19
CRT and a conventional PM INDICATION
20
CRT and a conventional PM INDICATION
Key issues
  • In patients with a conventional indication for
    pacing, NYHA III/IV symptoms, an LVEF of 35,
    and a QRS width of 120 ms, a CRT-P/CRT-D is
    indicated
  • RV pacing will induce dyssynchrony
  • Chronic RV pacing in patients with LV
    dysfunction should be avoided
  • CRT may permit adequate up-titration of
    b-blocker treatment

21
CRT and RENAL FAILURE
PACE 2008 31575579
22
CRT and RENAL FAILURE
PACE 2008 31575579
23
CRT and RENAL FAILURE
Retrospective study on n239 ICD pts (all 1-ary
prev) CR-dysf creatin.gt2mg/dl or under
dialysis FU 1815 months Mortality in CR-dysf
48.6 Mortality in controls 8.2
Cuculich P al. PACE 2007
24
CRT and RENAL FAILURE
Key issues
  • RF is associated with an increased risk for
    all-cause mortality, largely explained by an
    increased risk for pump-failure death
  • High creatinine remaines an independent
    predictor of mortality in CRT recipients
  • RF pts despite ICD implantation extract little,
    if any, survival benefit from this therapy

25
CRT and ADVANCED AGE
26
CRT and ADVANCED AGE
27
CRT and ADVANCED AGE
28
CRT and ADVANCED AGE
29
CRT and ADVANCED AGE
Key issues
  • HF is predominantly a disorder of older adults
  • Very few pts over age 75 were enrolled in the
    major ICD trials
  • None of the CRT trials included pts in this age
    range
  • With respect to ICDs high procedural
    complication rates , short life expectancy, high
    risk of dying from causes other than SCD
  • ICD is unlikely to be favorable for most pts

30
(No Transcript)
31
  • The challenge of selecting patients for ICD
    therapy
  • Cost
  • Life expectancy
  • Complications
  • Inappropriate shocks
  • Patients persective
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com