Title: Kein Folientitel
1Do Simplified Models Have any Useful Skill ?
Thomas Stocker
Climate and Environmental Physics University of
Bern, Switzerland www.climate.unibe.ch
Collaborators R. Knutti, F. Joos, G.-K.
Plattner, A. Schmittner
2Content of Presentation
1. A model hierarchy 2. Simplified models
progress or confusion? 3. When are simplified
models useful?
- extensive parameter studies
- developing novel model strategies
- coupling biogeochemistry and other tracers
4. Prospects of simplified modeling
3Hierarchy of Climate Models
4approx. CPU time for 250-year simulation
5Example 1
Multiple equilibrium states of the Atlantic
overturning circulation
6One wonders whether other, quite different
states of flow are permissible in the ocean or
some estuaries and if such a system might jump
into one of these with a sufficient perturbation.
If so, the system is inherently fraught with
possibilities for speculation about climatic
change. Stommel (1961)
7Bryan (1986)
8Multiple Equilibria of the Atlantic MOC
9Simplified models propose a unified explanation
of abrupt climate change
10Example 2
Ocean circulation during the last glacial maximum
(20,000 years ago)
11Atlantic MOC at the Last Glacial Maximum
- zonally averaged ocean model
- statistical dynamical atmosphere
- modified Arctic freshwater fluxes
Ganopolski et al. (1998)
12Atlantic MOC at the Last Glacial Maximum
- 3d ocean model
- energy-moisture balance atmosphere
- modified continental run-off
Weaver et al. (1998)
13Atlantic MOC at the Last Glacial Maximum
DWF shifted south MOC at similar strength deep
ocean less ventilated
DWF as today MOC reduced by gt 60 deep ocean
less ventilated
14- Specific realisations of simplified models are
too strongly influenced by model setup and
parameter choices. - No information on the robustness of the results.
15What constitutes a useful contribution of
simplified models to science progress ?
- extensive parameter studies
- developing novel model strategies
- coupling biogeochemistry
16Simplified models are useful ...
to perform extensive parameter studies and to
explore uncertainties
17Change of the Atlantic meridional overturning
- IPCC TAR (2001, Chapter 9)
18Greenhouse Gas Forcing
Atlantic MOC Beyond 2100
(Stocker Schmittner, 1997)
19Threshold of North Atlantic MOC
Atlantic MOC Beyond 2100
(Stocker Schmittner, 1997)
20Parameter dependence of MOC threshold
(Stocker Schmittner, 1997)
21Parameter dependence of MOC threshold
(Stocker Schmittner, 1997)
22Predictability of Atlantic MOC
Knutti Stocker (2002)
23Simplified models are useful ...
to develop novel modeling strategies to outline
possible application by more complex models
24IPCC WG1, SPM
25Estimating a PDF requires 5,000 model simulations
26Influence of mixing schemes on climate sensitivity
27Climate sensitivity in different comprehensive
models
IPCC TAR WG1, Table 9.A1
It seems likely that models with higher
sensitivity, those predicting the most drastic
anthropogenic climate changes in the future, may
have difficulty satisfying the ocean
constraint. (Barnett et al., 2001)
28global ocean heat uptake from the mid 50s to the
mid 90s 2?1023 J
Levitus et al. (2000)
29Coupled model simulation including anthropogenic
forcing
- observed GHG
- direct aerosol effect
- no indirect aerosol effect
ocean heat uptake consistent for small climate
sensitivity.
Barnett et al. (2001)
30Simulated ocean heat uptake 1955 - 1995
complete forcing
no aerosol cooling
Knutti et al. (2002)
31How well do observations constrain climate
sensitivity?
complete forcing
Knutti et al. (2002)
32How well do observations constrain climate
sensitivity?
no aerosol cooling
complete forcing
Knutti et al. (2002)
33Simplified models are useful ...
to include biogeochemical cycles and various
tracers to investigate processes in the coupled
system
34Climate model of reduced complexity
- zonally averaged ocean, 3 basins
- energy balance atmosphere
- thermodynamic sea ice model
- annual mean or seasonal cycle
- prognostic carbon cycle
35Anthropogenic CO2 in the Atlantic
Plattner et al. (2002)
36Outgassing of O2 in the Atlantic
Plattner et al. (2002)
37Revision of land uptake estimates
Plattner et al. (2002)
38Do simplified models have any useful skill?
39Simplified models pros and cons
- positive
- great tools, efficient, lots of sensitivity
studies - dont need big computers
- parameterisations can be kept transparent
- negative
- implication of reduced dynamics not testable
- what was the model designed for?
- time and spatial scales?
40Simplified models pros and cons
- contribution to progress
- exploration of parameter space
- estimation of uncertainty
- development of novel methodologies
- long-term simulation of coupled system
- not useful
- singular simulation syndrom
- data fitting
- over-parameterisation
41Judicious use of simplified models
- simplified models cannot replace complex models.
Reduced dynamics may, however, exhibit more
clearly the dominating processes and feedback
mechnisms at work. - simplified models are useful if applied
judiciously. Beware of singular simulations!
Robustness of results can be tested much better
than in more complex models. - simplified models serve to test hypotheses, and
explore their implications for other components
of the climate system. They help target
experiments with more expensive models.
42Prospects of simplified models
- They shall not disappear! Simplified models
remain valuable helpers in understanding the
Earth system. - Simplified models will be used in feasibility
studies before expensive simulations are started. - Simplified models will be used to interpret
paleoclimatic data, and to test/determine
transfer functions for proxy indicators. - Simplified models will be increasingly used for
long-term (millennial) simulations for past and
future climate changes.