Individual Subsystem Testing Report - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Individual Subsystem Testing Report

Description:

Title: Team Name Author: Emily Logan Last modified by: Michael H Stevenson Created Date: 1/13/2006 4:26:51 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: EmilyL153
Learn more at: https://www.colorado.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Individual Subsystem Testing Report


1
Individual Subsystem Testing Report
  • Zero Tilt
  • Frostburg State University
  • Kaetie Combs, Francisco Diaz , Sean Hughes, Jared
    Hughes, Andrew Huntley, Subhasis Ghosh, Mayowa
    Ogundipe, Derek Val-Addo, Michael Stevenson,
    Shaun ODonnell, Ian Cuddahee, Michael Young,
    David Wall
  • February 13 2012

2
Mission Overview
  • Mission Statement Zero Tilts goal is to
    provide, for the first time, a stable environment
    throughout the flight of a Sounding Rocket via
    two concurrent objectives
  • Tilt correction system
  • Despun platform system

whs.mil
3
Mission Objectives
  • We plan to
  • Counteract the platform spin
  • Orient the platform parallel to the earths
    surface at all times
  • We expect to prove that it is possible to correct
    spin, tilt, and determine the altitude based upon
    a level reference.
  • This could benefit any scientific experiment that
    requires stabilization

4
Mission Objectives Theory and Concepts
  • The underlying theory and concepts
  • negative feedback control systems
  • concepts of torque and centripetal force
  • Micro electromechanical systems (MEMS)
  • Real-Time Systems Theory (for multi-tasking

5
Mission Overview Mission Requirements
  • Mission Objectives
  • Counter the spin of the rocket during flight.
  • Keep a level surface to earth using our
    conceptual design.
  • Prove successful by using the stored gyroscope
    output and the feedback from various motors.
  • Minimum success criteria
  • Our main goals as the Zero Tilt team is to
    receive results indicating that we achieved zero
    tilt for the flight of a sounding rocket.

6
Functional Block Diagrams
Zero Tilt System
Tilt System
Despun System
Power System
shoponline2011.com
7
Power Subsystem (Despun)
Power Supply 9 volt Lithiums 24 Volt Total
Flash Memory
Voltage Regulator 5 to 3 volts
Voltage Regulator 24 to 5 Volts
De-spin Motor
Atmega 32 Processor
High G Accelerometer
High G Accelerometer
8
Power Subsystem (Tilt)
Power Supply 9 volt Lithiums 24 Volt Total
Flash Memory
Voltage Regulator 24 to 3 volts
Gyroscope
Voltage Regulator 24 to 6 volts
Voltage Regulator 24 to 5 volts
Atmega 32 Processor
Spin Motor
Tilt Motor
Low G Accelerometer
9
Despun System
High G Accelerometer
Flash Memory
Atmega 32 Processor
High G Accelerometer
Motorcontroller/Driver
Despun Motor
10
Tilt System
Spin Motor
Flash Memory
Atmega 32 Processor
Tilt Motor
Low-G Accelerometer
Gyroscope
11
Changes from CDR
  • Decided to consider a new servo motor that has
    lower power requirements, a faster response time,
    and more torque.
  • We are running power wires from slip ring
    directly onto board due to our decision to limit
    our turn radius on the tilt platform.
  • Due to Servo Considerations some minor design
    changes are being made for placement on Tilt
    platform.

12
Program Management and Team Updates
Pictured from left to right Mayowa Ogundipe,
Subhasis Ghosh, Jared Hughes, Ian Cuddahee, Sean
Hughes Derek Val-Addo, Andrew Huntley, Kaetie
Combs, Michael Stevenson, Francisco Diaz, Michael
Young, Dr. Mohammed Eltayeb, Shaun ODonnell,
David Wall
13
Schedule Update
  • We are on schedule electrically and are waiting
    on the fabrication of mechanical parts to finish
    testing.
  • We have shifted the completion of the mechanical
    tests later because of machining time.
  • We are focusing our efforts on completing the
    electrical elements so that we know they will be
    reliable on the mechanical layout.
  • Our main concern is completing our mechanical
    fabrication so we can finish testing.

14
Subsystem Overview
  • Subsystems
  • Electrical
  • Discussion by Mayowa Ogundipe, and Derek Val-Addo
  • Power
  • Discussion by Andrew Huntley, Jared Hughes, and
    Sean Hughes
  • Mechanical
  • Discussion by Shaun ODonnell, and David Wall

nisd.net
15
Electrical Subsystem Update
  • Status
  • What is complete/what has been tested?
  • What has not yet been checked out?

16
Electrical Subsystem Update (Continued)
17
Electrical Subsystem Update
  • What were the results?
  • We were able to collect gyroscope and
    accelerometer data. (dps for gyroscope, and
    voltage for the accelerometer)
  • We were able to convert dps to degrees for the
    Gyroscope and voltage to gs for the
    accelerometer.
  • We were able to program the servo motor to react
    to changes in degree measure read from the
    gyroscope, either positive or negative.

lochnessproject.org
18
Power Subsystem Update
  • Status
  • What is complete/what has been tested?
  • What has not yet been checked out?

19
Power Subsystem Update
Power Requirements
Device maximum Current drawn(mA) Operating Voltage(V) Max Operating Voltage number Total Current drawn(mA/H) Maximum power dissapation(W)
Atmega 32 1.1 2.7-5.5 5.5 2 2.2 0.0121
High-G Accelerometer ADXL278 2.9 5(-5) 5 2 5.8 0.029
Low-G Accelerometer ADXL203 1.1 5 5 1 1.1 0.0055
Motor Controller TB6585FG 14 4.7 4.7 1 14 0.0658
Voltage Regulator MAX3379 0.3 1.2-5.5 5.5 7 2.1 0.01155
Gyroscope L3G3200D 6.1 2.4-3.6 3.6 1 6.1 0.02196
Flash memory AT26DF161A 5 2.7-3.6 3.6 2 10 0.036
Motor 2 HS145CR 150 4.8-6 6 1 150 0.9
Motor 0 3268...BX4 SC 2000 24 24 1 2000 48
Motor 1 HS-5245MG 230 4.8-6 6 1 230 1.38



Total 2421.3 50.46191

Current provided Weight Voltage Total Batteries
Lithuim Batteries 2700-3400mA/hr 15 1.5 16
Alkaline 1800-2600mA/hr 23 1.5 16

ENERGIZER LA522 1000 mA Continous Current 33.9 grams 9 6
20
Mechanical Subsystem Update
  • Status
  • What is complete/what has been tested?
  • What has not yet been checked out?

21
Mechanical Subsystem Update
  • Discussion of current mechanical objectives
    including machining
  • schedule, tilt platform construction, and
    slip ring mounting

22
Plan for Subsystem Integration
23
Lessons Learned
  • Subsystem testing requires rigid time restraints
    and an understanding of the time required to
    complete tasks. Taking into account setbacks and
    off-ramps. Designing a system would benefit also
    from an understand as to how it will be
    constructed. Engineering tasks are best
    approached by assigning specific tasks and
    deadlines to groups so that any dependencies can
    be accounted for.
  • If we started this project over we would ensure
    more carefully that the pieces selected could
    perform their designated tasks. We would also
    assign more ambitious deadlines and complete
    dependent items in a more time efficient manner.
  • So far, by designating tasks we have been able to
    work ahead in certain areas and share discoveries
    with the entire team. We have class discussions
    and demonstrations that function as learning
    tools for all of us.

http//sparetimeuniversity.com/?page_id153
24
Conclusions
  • In conclusion we hope to get up to speed with
    our mechanical subsystem. We intend to continue
    work with the electrical system and iron out
    Flash memory requirements and PCB board layouts
    so they will be ready for the Systems Integration
    Testing. We need to more extensively test power
    and ensure that our new selected batteries can
    supply the current and voltage needed.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com