Title: Random shapes in brain mapping and astrophysics using an idea from geostatistics
1Random shapes in brain mapping and
astrophysicsusing an idea from geostatistics
- Keith Worsley,
- McGill
- Jonathan Taylor,
- Stanford and Université de Montréal
- Arnaud Charil,
- Montreal Neurological Institute
2(No Transcript)
3CfA red shift survey, FWHM13.3
100
80
60
"Meat ball"
40
topology
"Bubble"
20
topology
0
Euler Characteristic (EC)
-20
-40
"Sponge"
-60
topology
CfA
-80
Random
Expected
-100
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
Gaussian threshold
4Brain imaging Detect sparse regions of
activation Construct a test statistic image
for detecting activation Activated regions test
statistic gt threshold Choose threshold to
control false positive rate to say 0.05 i.e.
P(max test statistic gt threshold)
0.05 Bonferroni???
5Example test statistic
Z1N(0,1)
Z2N(0,1)
s2
s1
Rejection regions,
Excursion sets,
Threshold t
Z2
Search Region, S
Z1
6Euler characteristic heuristic
Search Region, S
Excursion sets, Xt
EC 1 7 6 5 2
1 1 0
Observed
Expected
Euler characteristic, EC
Threshold, t
7Tube(?S,r)
Radius, r
Tube(Rt,r)
Radius, r
Z2
r
Rt
r
?S
Z1
Probability
Area
Radius of Tube, r
Radius of Tube, r
8Z2N(0,1)
Rejection region Rt
r
Tube(Rt,r)
Z1N(0,1)
t
t-r
Taylors Gaussian Kinematic Formula
9r
Tube(?S,r)
?S
Steiner-Weyl Volume of Tubes Formula
10Edge length ?
Lipschitz-Killing curvature of simplices
FWHM/v(4log2)
Lipschitz-Killing curvature of union of simplices
11Non-isotropic data?
ZN(0,1)
s2
s1
Can we warp the data to isotropy? i.e. multiply
edge lengths by ?? Locally yes, but we may need
extra dimensions. Nash Embedding
Theorem dimensions D D(D1)/2 D2
dimensions 5
12(No Transcript)
13Warping to isotropy not needed only warp the
triangles
ZN(0,1)
ZN(0,1)
s2
s1
Edge length ?
Lipschitz-Killing curvature of simplices
FWHM/v(4log2)
Lipschitz-Killing curvature of union of simplices
14We need independent identically distributed
random fields e.g. residuals from a linear model
Replace coordinates of the simplices in S?RealD
by (Z1,,Zn) / (Z1,,Zn) in Realn
Lipschitz-Killing curvature of simplices
Unbiased!
Lipschitz-Killing curvature of union of simplices
Unbiased!
15MS lesions and cortical thickness
- Idea MS lesions interrupt neuronal signals,
causing thinning in down-stream cortex - Data n 425 mild MS patients
- Lesion density, smoothed 10mm
- Cortical thickness, smoothed 20mm
- Find connectivity i.e. find voxels in 3D, nodes
in 2D with high - correlation(lesion density, cortical thickness)
- Look for high negative correlations
16n425 subjects, correlation -0.568
Average cortical thickness
Average lesion volume
17Thresholding? Cross correlation random field
- Correlation between 2 fields at 2 different
locations, searched over all pairs of locations - one in R (D dimensions), one in S (E dimensions)
- sample size n
- MS lesion data P0.05, c0.325, T7.07
Cao Worsley, Annals of Applied Probability
(1999)
18Normalization
- LDlesion density, CTcortical thickness
- Simple correlation
- Cor( LD, CT )
- Subtracting global mean thickness
- Cor( LD, CT avsurf(CT) )
- And removing overall lesion effect
- Cor( LD avWM(LD), CT avsurf(CT) )
19Histogram
threshold
threshold
Conditional histogram scaled to same max at
each distance
threshold
threshold