Title: LA MODLISATION DU COMPORTEMENT DU CONSOMMATEUR
1 Data Analysis Express Practical Application
using SPSS
2Data of Interest
- National Insurance Company
- 1000 questionnaires sent
- 285 respondents
- Questionnaire Presentation
- Copy given in class
3SPSS Data Set
- 2 Views Variable and Data.
- Raw Variable (labels and values)
- Transformed Variable (compute and recode)
4Preliminary Data Analysis Basic
Descriptive Statistics
- Preliminary data analysis examines the central
tendency and the dispersion of the data on each
variable in the data set - Measurement level dictates what to do
- Feeling for the data
- What can we do limitations on next slide? Run
descriptives. (outputs 1)
5Measures of Central Tendency and Dispersion for
Different Types of Variables
6Crosstabs Frequencies in specific condition.
- Most of the time with categorical variables
- Examples to run
7Cross-Tabulations- Comparing frequencies
Chi-square Contingency Test
- Technique used for determining whether there is a
statistically significant relationship between
two categorical (nominal or ordinal) variables
8Need to Conduct Chi-square Test to Reach a
Conclusion
- The hypotheses are
- H0There is no association between educational
level and willingness to recommend National to a
friend (the two variables are independent of each
other). - HaThere is some association between educational
level and willingness to recommend National to a
friend (the two variables are not independent of
each other). - Lets do it.
9National Insurance Company Study
10National Insurance Company Study --P-Value
Significance
- The actual significance level (p-value) 0.019
- the chances of getting a chi-square value as high
as 10.007 when there is no relationship between
education and recommendation are less than 19 in
1000. - The apparent relationship between education and
recommendation revealed by the sample data is
unlikely to have occurred because of chance. - We can safely reject null hypothesis.
11Precautions in Interpreting Cross Tabulation
Results
- Two-way tables cannot show conclusive evidence of
a causal relationship - Watch out for small cell sizes
- Increases the risk of drawing erroneous
inferences when more than two variables are
involved
12Comparing Means
- Mainly T-tests and ANOVAs
- T-test on OQ and gender.
13Independent T-tests
- Independent Variable with 2 categories max.
- Equality of variance (cf output)
- 88 of chance that the difference of .04 is due
to chance (random effect). Cannot reject the null
hypothesis.
14Analysis of Variance
- ANOVA is appropriate in situations where the
independent variable is set at certain specific
levels (called treatments in an ANOVA context)
and metric measurements of the dependent variable
are obtained at each of those levels
15Example
16Table 15.2 Unit Sales Data Under Three Pricing
Treatments
17ANOVA Grocery Store Hypothesis
- Grocery Store Example
- Ho ?1 ?2 ?3
- Ha At least one ? is different from one or
more of - the others
- Hypotheses for K Treatment groups or samples
- Ho ?1 ?2 ..?k
- Ha At least one ? is different from one or
more of - the others
18Exhibit 15.1 SPSS Computer Output for ANOVA
Analysis
19Exhibit 15.1 SPSS Computer Output for ANOVA
Analysis (Contd)
20ANOVA
- OQ recommendation and OQ, individual variable
- OQ and EDUC (Graph)..and post hoc