Jeff Williams - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Jeff Williams

Description:

Quality of training in core subjects. Updating of training programmes to ... Ofsted reorganisation & school inspections. Revised ITT inspection arrangements ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: kwri5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Jeff Williams


1
Jeff Williams Head of Quality Inspection
2
  • Todays newly qualified teachers are the best
    trained we have ever had
  • David Bell, HMCI 2003

3
Rationale
  • Intervention in inverse proportion to success
  • Proportionality

4
Purpose Methodology
  • Information giving structures expectations.
  • Information sharing quality comparisons.
  • Reflection discussion internal external.
  • Activity POAP overall POAP detail.
  • Questions guidance

5
Broader relevance
  • Inspection context
  • Self-evaluation
  • Cross fertilisation (phases/programmes/courses)

6
Primary Key strengths
  • Quality of training in core subjects
  • Updating of training programmes to reflect
    national priorities
  • Partnership arrangements
  • Training in behaviour management
  • Increasing focus on ICT

7
Primary Key issues and areas for development
  • Training across the whole age-range
  • Demand for Key Stage 1 placements
  • EAL training

8
Secondary Key strengths
  • Coherence
  • (GPS-Subject Central-School)
  • High Quality Training Sessions
  • (how-why modelling challenging)
  • Subject Knowledge
  • (application to learning teaching making
    ideas/concepts accessible to pupils)
  • Matching Training to Individual Needs
  • (throughout including trainees
    self-evaluation)
  • Leadership Management
  • (shared understanding across the partnership and
    across subjects wider course review and
    development clear priorities)

9
DRBs 2004-05
  • GTP less strong than PGCE in subject teaching,
    planning assessment.
  • GTP stronger than PGCE in classroom management
    and organisation.
  • GTP Primary generally stronger than Secondary
  • Additional Key Issues
  • Subject training Monitoring Matching trainees
    to schools including second school.

10
MQA grades for primary and secondary providers
2002-05
11
NQTs corroboration
12
MQA grades for primary and secondary HEIs and
Scitts 2002-05
13
Management of the training programme
  • Quality is not determined by size
  • Well designed structures do not always secure
    high quality training
  • Grades were depressed because of two key factors
  • Inconsistency in the quality of school-based
    training
  • Variation in the quality of the subject courses
  • Resolved by
  • i) Clear guidance ii) Range of well-planned
    interventions

14
Quality assurance
  • The least strong of the key questions
  • Strengths
  • Use of a wide range of evidence to provide
    information about the course
  • Prompt response to issues raised by trainees and
    external examiners
  • Effective action plans based on inspection
    findings

15
Quality assurance
  • Grades were depressed where
  • Providers were not sufficiently aware of the
    quality of school-based training
  • Professional tutors did not carry out their
    responsibilities effectively
  • QA procedures failed to pick up some elementary
    compliance issues
  • Self evaluation lacked rigour

16
Challenges
  • To continue producing sufficient high quality
    teachers to meet the changing needs of schools.
  • To further develop the combined and congruent
    efforts of the TDA with ITT providers, schools,
    LEAs, Ofsted, DfES and other partners to achieve
    ongoing effective and high quality training.

17
Changes over the 2002-05 cycle
  • Extended remit of the TDA
  • Ofsted reorganisation school inspections
  • Revised ITT inspection arrangements
  • Review of the QTS Standards

18
Developments over the 2002-05 cycle
  • Teacher Training Resource Bank
  • Consultancy, conferences and regional networks
  • Mid-inspection liaison and intervention
  • Pre-inspection support and monitoring
  • Post-Ofsted Action Planning

19
How do we sustain the quality?
  • R4.5 ..systematic monitoring, evaluation and
    improvement planning
  • R4.6 ..regular benchmarking of performance to
    inform target setting
  • Self-evaluations carried out by providers are
    key elements of inspection evidence. Managing
    inspectors use these to identify issues and set
    detailed agenda for inspections.

20
The emerging picture..
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Benchmarking
  • Comparison with and evaluation against both
    similar and different provision
  • Cross-fertilisation of best practice across
    routes and programmes

21
Sources and usage
  • TDA Regional Reports
  • TDA regional and national events
  • TDA Performance Profiles
  • NQT survey Providers exit surveys
  • Ofsted reports
  • External examiners reports
  • Qualification profiles, gender, ethnicity,
    recruitment retention data.
  • Subject Associations guidance, developments and
    provision
  • Subject Enhancement and Extension course outcomes

22
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com