Title: Globalisation, Education and Development: The Case of East Asia
1Globalisation, Education and DevelopmentThe
Case of East Asia
National University of Tainan 18.5.07
- Andy Green
- Institute of Education
- University of London
2Research Project
- Globalisation, Education and Development
- Funded by DFID
- (Department for International Development)
- Published by DFID in May 2007
- Green, A., Little, A., Kamat, S., Oketch, M. and
Vickers, E. - Education and Development in a Global Era
Strategies for Successful Globalisation
3Scope of IOE Project
-
- A Review and Synthesis of the Literature on
Globalisation, Education and Development with
respect to - Education, Globalisation and Economic Development
- Globalisation, Skills, Qualifications and
Livelihoods - Education and Social Cohesion
- Based on
- General International Literature
- Literature Specific to China, Kenya, India and
Sri Lanka -
4Aims of Research
- To assess the role of education in promoting
successful engagement with the Global Economy. - By successful we mean ways of engaging with
globalization which lead to economic growth with - Reduction in Poverty
- Increasing income equality
- Social Improvements (including greater social
cohesion) - Growth with Equity
5The Importance of Globalisation
- Globalisation
- understood as the rapid acceleration of
cross-border movements of good, labour capital
services, information and ideas - Changes the terms of development
6Theories of globalisation and development
- There are many theories of globalisation
- Hyper-globalisation theory (Ohmae et al)
- Sceptics (Hirst and Thompson)
- Transformationalists (Held)
- How you view globalisation will determine how
you view the possibilities for development.
7Different emphases 1 Convergence or divergence?
- If you view globalisation as an inevitable,
linear, convergent and uncontradictory process of
dissemination of free market capitalism then
there is only one road for development
(Washington consensus model). - 2. If you view it as contradictory and uneven
then alternative modes of development are
conceiveable.
8Different emphases 2 Role of the state
- 1. If you see the role of the national state
under globalisation as increasingly marginalised
then the state has a limited role in development
best to leave the markets to work without state
intervention and just give aid (Sachs) - 2. If on the other hand you regard states as
important to development (failed states as
hindering/developmental states as promoting)
then you are likely to judge the role of the
state as highly important.
9The Contradictions of Globalisation
- Globalisation is an uneven, contingent and
contradictory process, creating greater global
wealth but also increasing global inequality in
the distribution of wealth. - Some Regions (Europe, North America, and East
Asia) have clearly benefited more from global
engagement than others (such as Latin America and
SSA) -
10Successful gobalisation
- Because globalisation is contradictory and
uneven and state-dependent there are different
possible responses to it. -
- Success in engaging with the global market
depends on the -
- Terms of engagement which each country can
achieve. -
- Some countries are able to negotiate better
terms than others
11Globalisation and Development
- Changes the nature of world markets and what it
takes to be competitive in them - Changes the nature of the national state and the
relations between states and other levels of
governance - Alters the possible paths of development
12Globalisation is changing the dynamics of
development
- In terms of the factors promoting economic
development globalisation increases the
importance of - international trade (and thus the need for
export-oriented economies) - Knowledge, skills and technology transfer for
development in the global knowledge economy. - MNCs and FDI in knowledge and technology transfer
- education and skills (as argued in endogenous
growth theory)
13The Conditions for Late Development (Amsden)
- Late industrialising countries countries
can develop more rapidly in a global era due to - the global disaggregation of production and
services industries the global division of
labour - Increased possibilities for knowledge and
technology transfer from - - increased investment flows
- - increasing codification of knowledge and
skills - - advances in ICT
14The Role of Education
- Education can play major role in promoting
successful engagement with the global economy by
six key processes - Providing skills which attract inward investment
- Assisting in knowledge and technology transfer
- Upgrading the economy
- Reducing inequality
- Promoting social cohesion
- Strengthening state capacity
15The East AsianCase(s)
- East Asian economies have proved to be
exceptional in negotiating favourable terms of
engagement with the global economy. - Partly because of the role education has played
in promoting the six key processes.
16East Asian Development 1960 -1990 The East
Asian Miracle
- East Asian economic growth between 1960 and
1990 was the fastest on record for any region - It took Britain 58 years to double real pc
income after 1780 - USA 47 years from 1839
- Japan 34 years from 1900
- Korea 11 years from 1966
- In 1960 S. Koreas GDP equalled Sudans and
Taiwans Zaire. (Morris, 1995). These are now
amongst the worlds developed countries
17East Asian Growth 1965 - 1990
- 23 economies in East Asia grew faster than
all other regions at 5.3 pa, mostly due to rapid
growth of 8 high performing Asian economies
(HPAEs) Japan, the four tigers (S. Korea,
Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong) and the East
Asian NICS Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. - Average growth pa
- HPAEs 5.3
- East Asia minus HPAEs 2.3
- OECD 2.3
- Latin America 1.9
- Sub-Saharan Africa 0.1
- (World Bank East Asian Miracle, 1996))
- Growth rate of Japan and tigers during 25
years from 1960 was over 8 pa on average (Wade,
1990). Growth rate of S. Korea 1962-1979 averaged
18.4 (Amsden, 1992)
18Growth, Distribution and Well Being
- Between 1960 and 1998 real income pc in Japan and
tigers increased x 4 - Life Expectancy in HPAEs grew from 56 years in
1960 to 71 in 1990 - Proportions living in absolute poverty declined
between 1960 and 1990 from 58 to 17 in
Indonesia and from 37 to 5 in Malaysia
(compared with 54 to 43 in India) - HPEAs also achieved low and often declining
levels of income inequality, particularly in
Japan and Taiwan but also, until the 1980s, in S.
Korea and Singapore. -
19Explanations of Rapid and Equal Development
-
- Rapid Development in East Asia is, to some
extent, a regional phenomenon. - Explanations have focused on
- Culture
- Geopolitics
- Timing
- Policies (including education)
20Culture
- Cultural explanations of EA development include
theories about Confucian Capitalism - Strong states and Confucian paternalism
- Mobilization of national identity
- Family Basis for Welfare
- Use of Diasporas and Flying Geese pattern
- Importance of Education
- However, theories are generally insufficient
to explain dynamics and timing of development - East Asia is highly diverse in ethnicity and
religion - Culture cannot explain why now
21The Importance of Geography and Geo-Politics
- Proximity to sea lanes and historic trade routes
- Advantages of island and peninsular states
coastal towns - Cold War stimulus to investment
- US and British investment high in Japan,
South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong and Taiwan
through period of Korean and Vietnam wars. - Between 1953 and 1958 US aid to Korea was 15 of
GDP and war requisitioning helped to kick start
the Chaebols. Singapore benefited from UK and US
requisitioning. - Up to 50 of finance for Taiwans infrastructure
in early years came from US aid - Geopolitics can only be part of the story. Some
states which benefited did not develop
(Philippines) and others (Malaysia, Thailand)
developed rapidly later, without similar levels
of cold war investment.
22Timing
- The timing for the first wave of East Asian
growth (second phase for Japan) was highly
propitious. - Buoyant global economy in 1960s
- Flexible trade regimes
- US cuts in Japanese imports helped tigers
- Conditions for rapid growth now less good
- Slower world economic growth
- More NIC competitors
- WTO limitations to trade policies which arguably
helped tigers - Globalisation restricts use of capital controls
which may also have helped tigers
23Factors favouring egalitarian development
- Weakening of old landed and Zaibatsu elites in
Japan as result of WW2 and subsequent land reform - Land reform in 1950s in Taiwan and S. Korea
(prompted by US!) redistributed landed wealth and
removed anti-modernising elites - Agricultural improvements in EA states with
agricultural economies reduced disparities or
rural and urban incomes - Rapid improvement in access to education reduced
growth inequalities (countering the usual Kuznets
effect) - Developmental states overcame entrenched class
interests? - Redistributional policies of governments ie
Malaysia pro Malay business policy, Singapore and
Hong Kong Housing programmes etc
24Policy Explanations of Growth
- Neo-classical economics
- Market friendly neo-classical
- economics (WB East Asian Miracle)
- Developmental state theory (Amsden, Wade, Johnson
etc)
25Neo-Classical theory
- Neo-classical economic explanations argue that
East Asian states got the basics right and left
the rest to the market - Private domestic investment and rapidly
increasing human capital were principal engines
of growth - High domestic savings sustained high investment
(typically savings at over 30 of income) - Increased agricultural productivity
- Effective public administration
- Good macro-economic management (low inflation and
borrowing stable exchange rates etc - Openness to trade
- Export led growth
26Developmental State theorists
- DST does not disagree with view that human
capital and investment were important and that
export led growth was central. - However, they argue that the conventional
account ignores the degree of state intervention
in growth and the use of neo-mercantilist
policies which deviated very substantially from
free trade. - With the exception of Hong Kong, Japan and the
tigers all had highly state-led development
programmes. They developed at a much faster rate
than the Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand which
were less interventionist. -
27The Crucial Role of the State
- Britain, America, Germany, France all used a
strong state for development through national
economies in early stages of growth. - Free Trade Policies only favour the strong
and even then have only been applied selectively. - Alexander Gerschenkron noted the key role of
the state in late development. - Under globalisation there has generally been
huge capital flows from the South to the North
except in East Asia where the state is powerful
enough to to control capital flight and direct
the economy efficiently. Naom Chomsky -
28Developmental Paths
- Each country followed similar development path
- import substitution and agricultural improvement
(late fifties) - export of cheap manufactured goods (early
sixties) (textiles toys shoes etc) based on low
cost labour - development of capital intensive goods (late
sixties /early seventies) (variously Steel,
Shipbuilding Petro chemicals etc) and electronic
consumer goods - shift to higher value added manufacturing
(1980s) - Singapore and Hong Kong relied heavily on FDI
since they had small domestic markets and little
domestic capital - Japan, Korea and Taiwan initially prefered
foreign loans and technology transfer through
licensing but gradually moved towards allowing
joint ventures and since 1997 foreign MNCs. - Korea copied Japan - large private conglomerates
working closely with state bureaucracy as engines
of growth. Taiwan maintained larger SME sector
but created many state owned large companies. -
-
29Developmental Policies in Japan and Tigers
- A range of policies used to stimulate economic
growth - To protect home industries
- Tariffs and import quotas to protect infant
industries - Tariffs, protectionist standards regulations and
high taxes on luxury and other goods to
discourage unnecessary consumption, encourage
saving and to allow exporting manufacturers to
reclaim losses on marked down foreign sales
through high domestic prices. - To encourage exports
- Export subsidies export targets preferential
loans for exporters tariff reduction on imported
inputs for exporters low exchange rates (which
helped exporter) export processing Zones
30Developmental Policies in Japan and Tigers 2
- Industrial Policy building up priority sectors
through - Preferential loans for companies to develop in
certain sectors - Directing credit through Govt banks or
regulation on private banks - Encouraging sector rationalisation through
forcing market exit or forced mergers of failing
companies. - Tax subsidies and infrastructural development for
R and D in favoured sectors. - To Encourage FDI
- Setting up one-stop-shop of Economic Development
Boards in Singapore and Korea - To encourage savings
- Post Office Saving Accounts (Japan and S. Korea)
- Mandatory providential fund savings (CPF in
Singapore)
31Effects of Interventions
- Most economists agree that market-governing
measures were widely used in Japan and three
tigers in first stage of development although
countries later liberalised. The argument is
about what effect the interventions they had. - Neo-classical economists say growth would
have happened anyway without these policies.
Developmentalists say they were generally
beneficial to growth and key to success. -
- All agree that pre-conditions for market
governing intervention working was that - Firms were forced to remain competitive
- Interventions were carefully monitored so that
subsidies removed from firms not achieving - Measures required competent and honest
bureaucracy.
32Role of Education
-
- General view education played major role in
East Asian Miracle - WB from growth accounting estimates far and
away the major difference in predicted growth
rates between HPAEs and sub-Saharan Africa
derives from variations in primary school
enrolment rates. (EAM p. 54)
33Different Theories of Educations Role
- Writers on East Asia differ on how they
understand the role of education in rapid growth.
Three theories - Human capital theory (WB)
- Developmental Skill Formation (Ashton and Green)
- Education and State Formation (High skills
Project)
34Human Capital Account
- Skills contributed significantly to
productivity growth and technology transfer. - Educational development was successful because
it largely followed the market and was informed
sound policies - HPAEs had high initial levels of literacy
(although so did Sri Lanka and Philippines in
1960s) - Investment focused initially on universalising
primary education which had highest rate of
return - Secondary and higher education were developed
sequentially when growth and higher rates of
return to higher levels encouraged private
investment - Growth, private investment and declining birth
rates (earlier and sharper than in other
developing countries) allowed increased in per
capita spending and higher enrols in education
without excessive public cost. -
35School Enrolment at Primary Level Relative to
Estimated 5-14 Population in 1960
- Tigers
- Hong Kong 57
- Singapore 66
- South Korea 60
- Taiwan 67
- Others
- Brazil 45
- Chile 69
- Ethiopia 5
- Indonesia 40
- Kenya 49
- Pakistan 22
- Uganda 32
36Average Years of Schooling Attained by
Population over 15
- 1960 1990
- Latin America
- and Caribbean 3.26 5.24
- M. East/ N. Africa 1.22 4.47
- SS Africa 1.73 2.93
- S Asia 1.51 3.85
- OECD 7.05 9.02
- HK 5.17 9.15
- Singpore 4.33 5.89
- South Korea 4.25 9.94
- Taiwan 3.87 7.98
- (Barro and Lee, 1996)
37Public Expenditure on Education as of GNP
- 1960 1989
- HK - 2.8
- S. Korea 2.0 3.6
- Singpore 2.8 3.4
- Malaysia 2.9 5.6
- Thailand 2.3 3.2
- Indonesia 2.5 3.5
- HPAE av. 2.5 3.7
- Brazil 1.9 3.7
- Pakistan 1.1 2.63
- SSA 2.4 4.1
- (WB East Asian Miracle)
38Developmetnal Skills Formation Critique
- Developmental skills formation theory (Ashton
and Green) does not disagree with many of the
human capital assertions. However, it claims they
miss - Importance and secondary, technical and higher
education expansion in later stages of
development - The role played by the state in generating demand
for skills - The role played by the state in coordinating
skills supply and Demand.
39State intervention to increase the demand for
skills
-
- Through industrial policy to increase investment
in high value added industries - Through forcing MNCs to bring in more capital and
skills intensive operations - The classic example was the Singapore strategy
for skills upgrading in 1980s
40Second Industrial Revolution in Singapore
- Gary Rodan describes Singapore efforts in early
1980s to shift to a high skill economy when it
could no longer compete with NICs on low cost
manufacture. - Substantial increase in minimum wages
- Tax subsidies to MNCs for hi-tech investment
- Introduction of Skills Development Fund financed
from a levy on employers of 2 of wage costs for
all workers S750 or less pm - Encouraging MNCs not wanting to upgrade to exit
- Strategy quite successful in increasing high
value-added production in Singapore but had to be
aborted in mid 1980s when labour costs rose to
uncompetitive level.
41Coordinating Supply and Demand
- Using manpower planning through high level
inter-ministerial strategy committees (CPTE in
Spore) - Setting quotas for enrolments in Secondary and HE
(S. Korea, Taiwan and S Korea till 1980)
according to forward industrial planning - Revising these when needed
- Brokering deals with MNCs (Singapore through EDB)
to provide skills and for MNCs to provide
training abroad and set up joint training centres
in Singapore. French, Japanese and German
technical institutes set up jointly with
government. - Upgrading technical education rapidly in line
with planned economic strategy (setting up of ITE
in early 1970s in Singapore)
42Broader Contribution of Education to Development
- Education in Japan and the Tigers has
contributed to development in various ways - Through provision of skills
- Through inculcation of work discipline (one days
leave a month in Korean factories in 1960s!) - Through socialisation into survival national
ideologies which have helped maintain political
stability - Through popularising meritocratic ideology that
encouraged endeavour - Through other educational policies designed to
enhance equality and social cohesion
43Commonalities of East Asian Schooling
- East Asian education and training systems differ
in some significant ways - Japan, Taiwan and Korea are highly egalitarian
(Non-selective neighbourhood comprehensive
schools mixed ability classes equal resource
distribution between school) Singapore and Hong
Kong are comparatively elitist - Japan and Korea have extensive company based
training in large firms. Singapore relies much
more heavily on Govt funded workforce
development - However, they have a number of features in common
(Cumings)
44Commonalities of East Asian Schooling
- Highly centralised administration (although this
is beginning to change now) - Major stress on dissemination of basic skills
- Bias towards Maths and Engineering (20 get maths
A level in Singpore and 40 of graduates are
engineers) - Major stress on Moral and Civic education (made
possible by centralised control)
45Benefits and Costs of Education Bias to Maths and
Engineering
- Has served growing manufacturing economy well
- Has also produced competent civil servants (In
Singapore they say engineers make best civil
servants) - However, lack of creative education has not
necessarily been good for producing creative and
entrepreneurial talents. Singapore compensates
for this by importing foreign talent, but all
Japan and tigers all now complain of lack of
creative skills in leading edge science and
business innovation.
46Importance of Socialisation
- Arguably the most important contribution of
education to economic development in Japan and
Tigers has been through effective youth
socialisation - Encouraging disciplined attitudes to hard work
- Generating national spirit of struggle and
sacrifice in early generation (to encourage
saving and effort and acceptance of overpriced
consumer goods etc). Koreans went en mass to
pubic collection centres to hand over their
silverware during the economic crisis! Japanese
have put up with over-priced Japanese rice for
years because they have been convinced it is
patriotic! - Creating ability to work in teams (more notable
in Japan and Korea than Singapore perhaps)