CONFLICT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

CONFLICT

Description:

Both involve some degree of opposing behaviour. Both have the belief that one party ... people are complacent or stagnant and there is a shortage of new ideas. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Home1708
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CONFLICT


1
CONFLICT
  • Conflict is
  • the behaviour of an individual or group which
  • purposely sets out to block or inhibit another
    group
  • (or individual) from achieving its goals
  • (Rollinson and Broadfield, 2002427)

2
CONFLICT AND COMPETITION
  • Common Aspects
  • Both involve some degree of opposing behaviour.
  • Both have the belief that one party is attempting
    to deprive others of something which they value.
  • Differences
  • Conflict situations denote both incompatible
    goals and opposing behaviour. Competition can
    occur with greater commonality of goals and
    limited opposing or co-operative behaviour.
  • Competition - rules and procedures adhered
    toConflict - few rules and procedures regulate
    behaviour
  • In competition, individuals or groups do not
    obstruct or interfere with each other in
    attempting to satisfy their goals. In conflict,
    one groups goals jeopardise the others.

3
CONFLICT
  • 1. THE TRADITIONAL VIEW
  • The belief that all conflict is harmful and must
    be avoided.
  • argues that conflict indicates a malfunctioning
    within the group.
  • 2. THE HUMAN RELATIONS VIEW
  • The belief that conflict is a natural and
    inevitable outcome in any group.
  • argues that conflict is a natural occurrence in
    all groups and organisations.
  • since conflict was inevitable, the human
    relations school advocated acceptance of
    conflict.
  • proponents of the human relations view
    rationalized the existence of conflict - it
    cannot be eliminated and there are even times
    when conflict may benefit a groups performance
  • this view dominated conflict theory from the late
    1940s to the mid-1970s.

4
CONFLICT
  • 3. THE INTERACTIONIST VIEW
  • The belief that conflict is not only a positive
    force in a group but that it is absolutely
    necessary for a group to perform effectively.
  • While the human relations approach accepted
    conflict, the interactionist approach encourages
    conflict. Why?
  • it argues that a harmonious, peaceful, tranquil
    and co-operative group is prone to becoming
    static, apathetic and non-responsive to needs for
    change and innovation.
  • major contribution of the interactionist approach
    is encouraging group leaders to maintain an
    ongoing minimum level of conflict i.e. enough to
    keep the group viable, self-critical and
    creative.
  • Given the interactionist view, it becomes evident
    that to say conflict is all good or all bad is
    inappropriate and naive. Interactionist view is
    not that all conflicts are good Rather, it
    depends on the type of conflict i.e. is it
    functional or dysfunctional.

5
FUNCTIONAL AND DYSFUNCTIONAL CONFLICT
  • Functional (Constructive) Conflict
  • Conflict that supports the goals of the group
    and improves its performance.
  • Theoretically, one could say that there is
    probably an optimum level of functional conflict.
    The problem is in determining what is an optimum
    level.
  • Dysfunctional (Destructive) Conflict
  • Conflict that hinders group performance.
  • At any level, this type of conflict will cause
    problems for a group or organisation.

6
FUNCTIONAL AND DYSFUNCTIONAL CONFLICT
  • How can you tell if a conflict is functional or
  • dysfunctional when
  • demarcation is neither clear nor precise.
  • no one level of conflict can be adopted as
    acceptable or unacceptable under all conditions.
  • type and level of conflict that is functional for
    one group to-day may be dysfunctional for another
    group or for the same group on another occasion.
  • The criterion that differentiates functional from
  • dysfunctional conflict is group performance.
  • Since groups exist to attain a goal or goals, it
    is the
  • impact that the conflict has on the group, rather
    than
  • the individual member, that determines
    functionality.

7
POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE OUTCOMES OF CONFLICT
  • Positive Outcomes
  • Better ideas produced
  • People forced to search for new approaches
  • Long-standing problems brought to the surface and
    resolved
  • Clarification of individual views
  • Stimulation of interest and creativity
  • A chance for people to test their capacities
  • Negative Outcomes
  • Some people felt defeated and demeaned
  • The distance between people increased
  • A climate of mistrust and suspicion developed
  • Individuals and groups concentrated on their own
    narrow interests
  • Resistance developed rather than teamwork
  • An increase in employee turnover
  • (Schmidt)

8
SOURCES OF ORGANISATIONAL CONFLICT
  • Differences in perception
  • Differences between corporate and individual
    goals
  • Limited resources
  • Departmentalisation and specialisation
  • The nature of work activities
  • Role conflict
  • Inequitable treatment
  • Violation of territory
  • Environmental change
  • Conflict between the formal and informal
    organisation
  • Conflict between the manager and the managed
  • Conflict between the individual and the job
  • Conflict between individuals

9
REACTIONS TO CONFLICT
High
Competition Collaboration
Compromise Avoidance
Accommodation
Assertiveness desire to satisfy ones own
concerns
Low
Low
High
Co-operation the willingness to satisfy the
other partys concerns
10
FIVE TYPES OF REACTIONS TO CONFLICT
  • 1. Avoidance - Unassertive and uncooperative
    behaviour in which contact with the other party
    is avoided to prevent visible show of conflict
    either by withdrawing from the situation or
    suppressing the urge to engage in conflict, while
    not actually co-operating with the other party.
    A win-lose situation because the conflict remains
    unresolved.
  • Use when
  • the issue is trivial
  • neither party has a chance of satisfying its
    concerns
  • disruption cannot be allowed to continue
  • people need time to cool down
  • more information is needed to bring about a
    resolution
  • or there are hidden agendas and the apparent
    issue could mask something more fundamental.

11
FIVE TYPES OF REACTIONS TO CONFLICT
  • 2. Accommodation - Behaviour is unassertive and
    co-operative in which the party sacrifices owns
    aims to put the interests of the other party
    first. A win-lose situation.
  • Use when
  • one party is patently in the wrong
  • the issue is much more vital to one party than
    the other
  • a trade-off for an issue that comes later needs
    to be established
  • it is necessary to find a way for one party to
    retreat with dignity
  • a party needs to be able to learn from its
    mistakes.

12
REACTIONS TO CONFLICT
  • 3. Competition - Behaviour is assertive and
    uncooperative usually with attempts to overwhelm
    the other party, using threats or power. A
    win-lose mentality.
  • Use when
  • quick, decisive action is needed
  • the future popularity of the decision is
    unimportant
  • the matter is essential to organisational success
  • one or both parties would take advantage of the
    others less competitive behaviour.

13
REACTIONS TO CONFLICT
  • 4. Collaboration - Behaviour is assertive and
    co-operative in which the person attempts to
    achieve own interests, but by engaging in joint
    problem-solving with the other party to identify
    a solution that benefits both. A search for a
    win-win solution.
  • Use when
  • time is relatively plentiful
  • it is vital that both parties learn from the
    experience
  • gaining commitment of both parties to
    implementation is vital
  • it is necessary to work through feelings that
    might give rise to future conflicts.

14
REACTIONS TO CONFLICT
  • 5. Compromise - Intermediate amounts of
    assertive and co-operative behaviour in which the
    person forsakes some of own aims in return for
    satisfaction of others. No winners or losers.
  • Use when
  • the parties goals are important but not worth
    the disruption that could arise from using more
    assertive approaches
  • the parties have equal power and stalemate is
    likely
  • temporary settlements are needed or time is
    short.

15
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
  • Conflict Resolution is necessary
  • when a manager resolves a conflict that has
    become harmful or is disruptive to the
    organisation.
  • excessive time and effort if devoted to pursuit
    of conflicts rather than devoted to productive
    activity.
  • conflicts pursued to advance the goals of groups
    and sub-units rather than those of the
    organisation.
  • Conflict Stimulation is the creation and
    constructive use
  • of conflict by a manager and is used where
  • people are complacent or stagnant and there is a
    shortage of new ideas.
  • change is needed to revitalise the organisation
    and there is strong resistance to change.
  • there is too much consensus between groups and
    sub-units with a belief that co-operation is more
    important than performance.

16
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
  • Clarification of goals and objectives
  • Altering physical location
  • Resource distribution and sharing
  • Personnel policies and procedures
  • Non-monetary rewards
  • Development of interpersonal/group process
    skills
  • Group activities
  • Leadership and management
  • Organisational processes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com