Schema and Memory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Schema and Memory

Description:

Schema and Memory Reconstructing of the past. Recall versus Reconstruction Rashomon. Akira Kurosawa Takehiro: a samurai has been murdered Masako : his wife has been ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:132
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: max9151
Category:
Tags: memory | samurai | schema

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Schema and Memory


1
Schema and Memory
  • Reconstructing of the past.

2
Recall versus Reconstruction
  • Rashomon. Akira Kurosawa
  • Takehiro a samurai has been murdered
  • Masako his wife has been raped
  • Tajomaru suspect
  • Woodcutter the witness

Lie or memory bias?
3
Schema memory theories
  • Bartlett (1932). Schemas are knowledge
    structures.
  • All kinds of knowledge can be represented by
    schemas.
  • New information is stored in relation to previous
    knowledge (TOP DOWN PROCESSING OF NEW
    INFORMATION).
  • Schema theory can help to explain errors and
    distortions common in memory because we tend to
    want to normalise things in terms of existing
    knowledge.

4
Experimental supportBower, Black Turner (1979)
  • Students were asked to generate a script about
    visiting a health professional.
  • Later they read texts of, for example, what
    happened during a visit to a doctor or a dentist.
  • 26 of actions recalled were in the original
    script but not the later text. The students also
    tended to change the order consistent with the
    original script (canonical order).

5
Encoding
  • Special attention easy recall.
  • Ambiguous stimuli

6
Expectancies and Interpretation
  • Expectation
  • Laura is warm
  • Stimulus
  • Smile
  • Interpretation
  • Warmth
  • Expectation
  • Laura is cold
  • Stimulus
  • Smile
  • Interpretation
  • Self-satisfaction

7
Interpretations and memory
  • Recall the impression, not the behaviors.
  • Forget the source of behavior

8
Unambiguous stimuli. Attention
  • Schema-Congruent Information

Beliefs
Attention
Memory
Availability heuristic
9
Unambiguous stimuli.
  • Schema-Congruent Information

Meaningful structure
Beliefs
Memory
Remember unconventional, creative, sensitive,
individualistic, temperamental
10
Schema memory theories
  • Original theory (Bartlett, 1932)
  • Information that is consistent with pre-existent
    knowledge will be remembered better than what is
    unexpected.

11
Schema-plus-tag model Graesser and Nakamura
(1982)
  • New knowledge is stored with the prior knowledge
    and a set of tags which indicate atypical and
    irrelevant pieces of information contained in
    it. 
  • Atypical events that are specifically tagged are
    therefore easier to recognise. 

12
Unambiguous stimuli. Attention
  • Schema-Incongruent Information

Beliefs
Attention to unexpected
Memory
13
Unambiguous stimuli.
  • Schema-Incongruent Information

Meaningful structure (Working hard to reconcile)
Beliefs
Memory
When no time to elaborate the information
recall advantage disappears.
14
Congruent or Incongruent?
  • Stangor and McMillan (1992)
  • High motivation, elaboration Incongruent
  • Low elaboration Congruent
  • Both congruent and incongruent gt not relevant

15
Memory accuracy
  • Goal to be accurate more attention to the
    information.

16
Flashbulb memories
  • Vivid recollections of the circumstances
    surrounding highly emotional events.

Why?
17
Flashbulb memories
  • Emotional significance
  • stress hormones contribute to memorability.
  • Working harder to make sense of the event.
  • Public and private rehearsals

18
Expectancies during the retrieval
  • Cohen, 1981 Forming expectations before or after
    the event (librarian vs. waitress).

Selection bias
Expectancies
19
Current knowledge
  • Hindsight bias
  • Once we know that something has happened, we
    believe that we knew so all along.
  • Why? Reinterpretation of past ambiguous events
    according to the current knowledge.

20
Self-serving bias in memory
  • We selectively retrieve those memories that match
    the desired self-view.
  • Sanitioso, Kunda Fong, 1990
  • IV Motivation to be introvert or extrovert
  • Results More memories that support having the
    desired trait.

21
Theories about stability or change
  • We tend to believe that we are stable in some
    domains and different on other domains.

22
Exaggerating the Consistency between past and
present
  • Ross et al, 1981.
  • Procedure
  • Message about dental hygiene toothbrushing vs.
    floss.
  • Results
  • Reported more or less toothbrushing in the past.

23
Exaggerating the Difference between the Past and
the Present
  • E.g. Satisfaction with a useless self-improvement
    program.

24
Mood
  • Mood-congruency effect
  • When we are happy, we are likely to recall happy
    events
  • Depressed people more negative memories.
  • Mood dependancy effect
  • We are likely to recall events experienced in a
    similar mood.

25
Sleeper-effect
  • Forgetting the source of information.
  • Circumstances
  • Persuasive communication
  • Persuasive discrediting information
  • Optimal time delay (source is forgotten, but not
    the message)

26
Conclusion Schema and Memory
  • Memories are reconstructions of the past.
  • Our state of mind and external circumstances
    during the encoding and retrieval of the
    information affect the way we recall our past.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com