Presentazione di PowerPoint - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Presentazione di PowerPoint

Description:

Title: Presentazione di PowerPoint Author: alberto Last modified by: Francesco Uboldi Created Date: 9/23/2003 10:20:54 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: alber180
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Presentazione di PowerPoint


1
Targetting and Assimilation a dynamically
consistent approach Anna Trevisan, Alberto
Carrassi and Francesco Uboldi ISAC-CNR Bologna,
Italy, Dept. of Physics University of Ferrara,
LEGOS/SHOM, Toulouse, France
Summary
Results
  • A new assimilation method and results of its
    application in an adaptive observations
    experiment are presented.
  • Targetting and assimiliation are considered as
    two faces of the same problem and are addressed
    with a dynamically consistent approach.
  • Assimilation increment is confined within the
    unstable subspace where the most important
    components of the error are expected to grow.
  • The analysis cycle is considered as an
    observationally forced dynamical system whose
    stability is studied.
  • Unstable vectors of the Data Assimilation System
    are estimated by a modified Breeding technique.
  • Mathematical Formulation
  • The analysis increment is confined to the
    N-dimensional unstable subspace spanned by a set
    of N vectors en
  • (1)
  • where xa is the analysis, xf is the forecast
    (background) state, E is the I x N matrix (I
    being the total number of degrees of freedom)
    whose columns are the en vectors and the vector
    of coefficients a, the analysis increment in the
    subspace, is the control variable . This is
    equivalent to estimate the forecast error
    covariance as
  • (2)
  • where ? represents the forecast error covariance
    matrix in the N-dimensional subspace spanned by
    the columns of E. The solution is
  • (3)
  • here H is the (Jacobian of the) observation
    operator, R is the observation error covariance
    matrix, and yo is M-dimensional observation
    vector. It is intended here that N ? M, so that
    for each vector en there is at least one
    observation. If, in particular, we consider the
    case of a single vector and a single observation,
    NM1, E consists of the single column vector e
    and G of the scalar g2 . The solution is then
  • (4)
  • Where are scalars, too. If the observation is
    perfect
  • (5)
  • Comparison between two different experiments
  • Experiment type I all observations, fixed and
    adaptive, are assimilated by means of 3DVAR
  • Experiment type II the fixed observations are
    assimilated by means of 3DVAR the adaptive
    observations by means of the proposed method

The adaptive observation in both experiments is
placed at the location where the current bred
vector attains its maximum amplitude
Noisy Observations
Perfect Observations
FIG (1) Normalized RMS analysis error as a
function of time. The error is expressed in
potential enstrophy norm and it is normalized by
natural variability. Dotted line Experiment I-P
Continous Line Experiment II-P
FIG (4) Same as fig (1) Dotted line
Experiment I-N Continous Line Experiment II-N
FIG (5) Same as fig (3) Blue line Experiment
I-N Red Line Experiment II-N
FIG (2) Normalized time and vertical average RMS
analysis error.From Experiment II-P
Stability Analysis
FIG (3) Normalized time vertical and latidudinal
average RMS analysis error. Blu line Experiment
I-P Red line Experiment II-P. Red line results
from the same fields as fig (2), but averaged
also in latitude
FIG (6) Leading Lyapunov exponent of the
assimilation system as a function of time
(perfect observations). Values are averaged over
all previous instants. The growth rate is
expressed in units of days-1. Dotted line
Experiment type I-P (3DVar) Continuous Line
Experiment type II-P.
Conclusion The main conclusion of this work is
that the benefit of adaptive observations is
greatly enhanced if their assimilation is based
on the same dynamical principles as targetting.
Results show that a few carefully selected and
properly assimilated observations are sufficient
to control the instabilities of the Data
Assimilation System and obtain a drastic
reduction of analysis error. The success obtained
in the QG-Model makes us very hopeful that, even
in an operational environment with real adaptive
observations, this method can yield significant
improvement of the assimilation performance.
  • References
  • detailed results and theoretical discussion
    Carrassi A., A. Trevisan and F. Uboldi, 2004.
    Deterministic Data Assimilation and Targeting by
    Breeding on the Data Assimilation System.
    Submitted to J. Atmos. Sci..
  • on the 3DVar scheme Morss R., 1999. Adaptive
    Observations Idealized sampling strategy for
    improving numerical weather prediction. PhD
    thesis, Massachussets of Technology, Cambridge,
    MA, 225 pp.
  • on the QG model Rotunno R., and J. W. Bao,
    1996. A case study of cyclogenesis using a model
    hierarchy. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 1051-1066
  • a previous study with a small nonlinear model
    Trevisan A., and F. Uboldi, 2004. Assimilation of
    standard and targeted observation within the
    unstable subspace of the observation-analysis-fore
    cast cycle system. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 103-113
  • update of applications in progress Uboldi F.,
    A. Trevisan and A. Carrassi, 2004. Developing a
    Dynamically Based Assimilation Method for
    Targeted and Standard Observations. In review for
    Nonlinear Process in Geophysics.

A.Trevisan_at_isac.cnr.it
CONTACTS
carrassi_at_fe.infn.it
uboldi_at_thor.cst.cne
s.fr
Acknowledgments The authors thank Rebecca Morss
and Matteo Corazza for providing the code of
QG-Model and 3D-Var and for getting us started
with its use. We also thank Eugenia Kalnay and
Zoltan Toth for their useful comments.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com