THE BRITAIN QUALITY REVIEW - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

THE BRITAIN QUALITY REVIEW

Description:

Benchmarking introduced in England compatible with existing VisitScotland and WTB processes ... Co-operation with transport, planning and other agencies. One ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Merid4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: THE BRITAIN QUALITY REVIEW


1
THE BRITAINQUALITY REVIEW
2
Origin of the Review
  • Objective to introduce Britain-wide common
    standards for accommodation quality grading
  • Initiated by Dr Kim Howells, Tourism Minister
  • Commissioned jointly by the Chairmen of
    VisitBritain, VisitScotland, and Wales Tourist
    Board
  • With assurance of neutrality and commercial
    confidentiality, the AA and RAC joined

3
Review Group Members
  • Alan Britten (Chair)
  • Suzanne Bond (later Sue Piper), for RDAs
  • Bob Cotton, British Hospitality Association
  • Dorothy Naylor, for RTBs
  • Sir Ron Watson (later Sir William Lawrence), LGA
  • Julian Burrell, Wales Tourism Alliance
  • Quality Standards professionals
  • David Stanbridge, VisitBritain
  • Richard Day, RAC
  • Albert Hampson, AA
  • Chris Coleman, WTB
  • Tony Mercer, VisitScotland

4
CONCLUSIONS
  • There is nothing new in this
  • It is evolutionary not revolutionary
  • It is an idea whose time has come

5
THE REVIEW GROUPS STANCE
  • We acknowledgeD the customer as central
  • We excluded marketing - which remains the
    province of each Assessing body
  • We have no executive authority
  • We work as a team
  • We build on strength

6
CURRENT WEAKNESSES (I)
  • Customer Confusion
  • What does it mean?
  • Too many signs
  • Its not consistent

7
CURRENT WEAKNESSES (II)
  • Lack of Participation
  • My brand means more than stars
  • Quality standards are for the big boys
  • The leak is not at my end of the boat

8
CURRENT WEAKNESSES (III)
  • The Search for the Virtuous Circle
  • Lack of Participation means .
  • Lack of Enforcement means .
  • Lack of Customer Awareness means .
  • .Lack of Participation

9
THE RECOMMENDATIONS
  • These are only Recommendations
  • Need endorsement by the 3 Chairmen
  • Need support from customer research findings
  • Need consultation with industry
  • Need executive commitment from each of the 5
    bodies to implement

10
RECOMMENDATION (I)
  • That the common standards agreements in
  • principle should, after further pilot testing
  • and consultation, be introduced throughout
  • Britain from 2005/06.
  • Applies to
  • self-catering campus hostels travel accomm
    (budget hotels) guest accomm (BBs) hotels

11
STANDARDS
  • There will be no revolution, but no levelling
    down customer expectations are risingFor
    example
  • Within 3-year cycle, all hotels must offer
    en-suite inc at 1-star
  • Averaging discontinued (eg 2-star bedrooms,
    4-star reception and bar 3-star rating)

12
RECOMMENDATION (II)
  • Increased participation
  • Over 80 of leading hotels are now committed to
    the common standards scheme
  • A new Bridging Point should be introduced
  • Entry for those unable to meet current criteria
  • Will not give a Star rating
  • Provides a new bottom rung
  • Works alongside Fitness for Purpose
  • Now known as Entry Level Standard

13
THE ENTRY LEVEL STANDARD
One Star Standard (Quality)
Entry Level Standard
Fitness for Purpose (Compliance)
14
RECOMMENDATION (III)
  • Incentives for participants promotion of the
    schemes
  • National Boards to promote the schemes
    vigorously
  • Increase adoption of Assessed-only policies
  • LGA committed to TIC policy of preferential
    advice to customers regarding quality-assured
    accommodation
  • Regional Development Agencies committed to
    requiring quality scheme participation for RDA
    support
  • All Government and Public Service employers
    recommended to adopt assessed-only policy for
    employee travel

15
DATA
  • Benchmarking introduced in England compatible
    with existing VisitScotland and WTB processes
  • Assessors explain their conclusions
  • Businesses understand the next step
  • destinations, RDAs and national agencies can
    monitor improvements

16
RECOMMENDATION (IV)
  • An Annual Progress Report should be produced
  • and publicised
  • Effectiveness of the quality schemes
  • Quality upgrading by businesses
  • Investment by industry
  • Customer satisfaction

17
Implementation
  • Consumer Research, includes
  • Recognition of Stars for self-catering
  • Reaction to Diamonds or Stars for guest
    accommodation
  • Names eg Travel Accommodation Budget Hotels
    Boutique Hotels etc
  • Industry Consultation
  • Piloting
  • Calibration
  • Field Trials
  • Assessor Training
  • Begin Assessments

18
Implementation
  • Self Catering
  • 18,000 units
  • Assessments begin January 2005
  • In Guides November 2006
  • Serviced Accommodation
  • 11,600 units
  • Assessments begin January 2006
  • In Guides November 2007
  • Other Schemes
  • 6,000 units
  • Assessments begin January 2006
  • In Guides November 2007

19
Implementation
  • Quality review Group to continue in 2004
  • Consultation and advocacy
  • Research
  • Encourage local authority adoption to achieve 80
    Assessed-only in England by 2008 (currently
    around 55)
  • Drive to eliminate out of date signage

20
Wider Agenda
  • DCMS-led Quality and Skills co-ordinating body
  • Co-ordination with People 1st Sector Skills
    Council
  • Co-operation with transport, planning and other
    agencies
  • One-stop-shop complaints handling
  • Accessibility standards integration with main
    standards
  • Re-start national Sustainability work

21
OUTCOMES
  • The Virtuous Circle

Higher Quality
Greater pride within the industry
More customers
Stronger recruitment
More investment
Improved reputation
Greater customer awareness
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com