Title: R Sartori
1Impact of rotation and momentum input on the L-H
transition
- R Sartori
- Thank you to the people who contributed
2- Outline of the talk
- L-H threshold and
- Changes in rotation by changing NBI torque
(DIII-D) - Changes in rotation due to changes in SOL flow
(Alcator C-Mod) - Changes in rotation due to TF ripple (JET)
- Changes in rotation due to changes in momentum
input NBI vs no momentum input ICH and ECH
(Asdex Upgrade and JET) - Changes in rotation due to RMP
-
3- DIII-D L-H threshold depends on applied beam
torque and toroidal rotation -
P Gohil, H-mode workshop 2007
- The L-H threshold power is reduced by a factor of
3 going from prevalent co-injection to prevalent
counter in USN (ion grad-B drift away from
X-point) - Smaller reduction of PLH in LSN ? 80
- No difference between USN and LSN for counter and
balanced injection - Reduction in edge toroidal rotation is
correlated with the observed reduction in L-H
threshold power
4- DIII-D L-H threshold depends on applied beam
torque and toroidal rotation -
The L-H transition can be induced by reduction of
applied torque at constant power
5The experiment
- DIII-D L-H threshold dependence on
torque/rotation is independent of ion mass -
P Gohil, NF, to be published
- The increase of PLH with torque is seen also in
Hydrogen plasmas - In Hydrogen a factor of 2 larger threshold
observed in the range of torque explored
6Description of the Experiment
- DIII-D Changes in rotation/torque correlate with
edge turbulence dynamics -
GR McKee, IAEA 2008 D J Schlossberg, Phys. Of
Plasmas, 2009
- Changes in fluctuation level and flow pattern
between co-injection and balanced injection - Turbulence flow reversal in balanced injection ?
poloidal flow shear
- spectra obtained in 100 ms before L-H. Phase
shift of poloidally displaced channels Z1.2cm.
- Correlation between changes in injected torque
and poloidal group velocity of turbulence near
edge
7Description of the Experiment
- DIII-D Increased Er shear at lower rotation
-
- Interplay between pressure gradient and v X B
terms in Er - lower contribution of toroidal rotation term ?
increase in Er shear at the edge ? de-correlation
and suppression of turbulence .
8- Alcator C-Mod Changes in L-H threshold
correlated with changes in SOL flows/rotation -
From H Hubbard, EPS 2004
- Changes in core rotation correlated with changes
of SOL flows (largest in inner SOL)
- PLH two times higher in USN (ion ?B drift away
from X-point ) - Strong parallel flows are driven in the inner
SOL, co-current for LSN, counter current for USN - At the L-H threshold flows and rotation near a
constant value, independent of configuration ?
strong suggestion that SOL flows are causing
differences in PLH with configuration
9Comparison of density and temperature and
toroidal rotation profiles
- JET Variation of toroidal rotation due to TF
ripple changes -
1.5 ripple L-modes with low level of beam power
P De Vries et al, NF 48 2008
- Lower rotation with increasing ripple. Edge
rotation becomes negative at high ripple - ASCOT calculation ? that dominant mechanism for
reduction of rotation is banana orbit diffusion ?
induces a radial return current ? JXB torque in
counter current direction. For ripple of 0.5
this torque was found to be 20-30 of that
supplied by the NB system
10Comparison of power and torque density
- JET L-H threshold is not affected by large
variation in toroidal rotation due to TF ripple -
Y Andrew et al, PPCF 50 2008
- 0.08 ripple ? v? in co-current direction
- 1 ripple ? v? in counter-current direction
- Similar Te and Ti the transition
- v? unaffected by ripple
11Global and pedestal confinement is similar
- Asdex Upgrade L-H threshold is independent of
heating method ?momentum input/rotation -
F Ryter et al, NF 49 2009
- No difference in L-H power threshold and in the
density dependence of PLH between ICH and NBI,
for both D and He plasmas
12- JET L-H threshold is independent of heating
method ?momentum input/rotation -
Data from 1MA/1T to 3.8MA/3.8T
LH scaling from Righi et al NF 39, 1999
Andrew et al, PPCF 48 2006
- JET results shows that L-H access is independent
of heating method, as seen previously in JET for
all H isotopes - New data confirms the results and shows typical
changes from 6-8 kHz (NBIICH) down to 2.5KHz
(ICH) at 3T with similar threshold
13Effect of RMPs on the L-H transition Summary
from Carlos Hidalgo- H-mode workshop talk
JET No effect observed (2009 experimental
campaign)
MAST On MAST there is observation of the delay of
the L-H transition time if the n1 coils are
applied before the L-H transition but not with
n3.
DIII-D In Helium plasmas PL-H increased by gt50
in the presence of n3 RMP perturbations. Â
NSTX PL-H increases from 1.4 to 2.6 MW with
higher n3 current (65 increase for Pheat/ne)
14Summary and future work
- NXTS and JET results on L-H threshold with RMP
-
- PLH unaffected by application of RMP? if effect
exists it depends on the strenght of the
perturbation - 30 decrease in rotation
- PLH increases from 1.4 to 2.6 MW with higher n3
current
15- Evidence from DIII-D of strong effect of beam
torque on L-H threshold - The effect persist when mass (and X-point
height) are changed - For counter-injection, it reduces differences
between favourable and unfavourable grad-B
direction - The effect is less strong in favourable grad-B
direction (why?), therefore effect on threshold
scaling not as large as largest reported
variations - When rotation is changed by changing heating
methods and ripple the L-H threshold is
unchanged, with RMP it increases or is unvaried ?
suggest weaker link with rotation in DIII-D
results
16Comparison with same density and total power
JET data LSN configuration and reversed Bt and
Ip
- Reversed Bt direction? ion ?B drift away from
X-point and counter injection - Forward Bt direction ?ion ?B drift towards
X-point and co injection
- No difference between L-H power threshold with
ion ?B drift direction in the JET data.