Entergy Transmission Planning Summit

1
Generation and Transmission Developmentin the
Southeastern United States

• Entergy Transmission Planning Summit
• New Orleans, LA
• July 10, 2003

2
(No Transcript)
3
SERC Generation Development Survey

• Fifth annual survey
• Survey request sent in late January
• Information requested from Transmission Providers
• All results received by early March

Leading the Industry!!!
4
SERC Generation Development Survey

• Collects 10 years of planned generation
  development
• Categorizes facilities by interconnection status
• Interconnection service requested
• Interconnection agreement signed
• Sub-categories indicate the amount of generation
  designated as a network resource
• Reports aggregate, not plant specific, generation
  plant capabilities
• Final results reported on Regional and
  subregional basis

5
SERC Generation Development Survey
Current Status of Generation Plant Development In-Service Year of Added Generation (MW) In-Service Year of Added Generation (MW) In-Service Year of Added Generation (MW) In-Service Year of Added Generation (MW) In-Service Year of Added Generation (MW) In-Service Year of Added Generation (MW)
Current Status of Generation Plant Development 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
1) Interconnection Service Requested, Only 1993 4741 12447 9351 4514 675
gt Designated as Network Resource or has obtained Firm PTP Transmission service 1952 360 1951 6121 2102 505
2) Interconnection Agreement Signed/Filed 20223 7002 8372 1184 1600 0
gt Designated as Network Resource or has obtained Firm PTP Transmission service 5997 2143 1773 75 0 0
6
SERC Generation Development Survey
7
Projected Capacity Additions - Cumulative, by
Category -
8
Projected Capacity Additions - Annual, by
Subregion -
9
Projected Capacity Additions - Annual, by
Category -
10
Projected Capacity Additions - Cumulative
Additions, Only -
300000
250000
200000
Megawatts
150000
100000
50000
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Year
2001 Total
2002 Total
2003 Total
11
Survey Result Comparisons- Cumulative Additions,
Only -
2001 Survey Results
Total Projected Generating Plant Capability
Additions by July 1, 2010 (Summer Net Plant
Capability in MW)
205,837 MW
2002 Survey Results
Total Projected Generating Plant Capability
Additions by July 1, 2010 (Summer Net Plant
Capability in MW)
243,669 MW
2003 Survey Results
Total Projected Generating Plant Capability
Additions by July 1, 2010 (Summer Net Plant
Capability in MW)
72,897 MW
12
Projected Total Capacity- Existing Capacity plus
Cumulative Additions -
450000
400000
350000
Megawatts
300000
250000
200000
150000
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Year
2001 Total
2002 Total
2003 Total
13
Survey Result Comparisons - Existing Capacity
plus Cumulative Additions -
2001 Survey Results
Total Projected Generating Plant Capability in
July 1, 2010 (Summer Net Plant Capability in MW)
373,010 MW
2002 Survey Results
Total Projected Generating Plant Capability in
July 1, 2010 (Summer Net Plant Capability in MW)
422,988 MW
2003 Survey Results
Total Projected Generating Plant Capability in
July 1, 2010 (Summer Net Plant Capability in MW)
274,011 MW
14
Load Trend vs. Projected Total Capacity
15
(No Transcript)
16
SERC Generation Development Survey

• Total projected generation capacity for Summer
  03 (222,960 MW) exceeds projected Summer 03
  load (157,941 MW) by 65,000 MW
• Total connected generation capacity at the end of
  last year exceeds projections for SERC Regional
  load in 2012
• Projected capacity additions indicate sufficient
  generating resources over the long-term planning
  horizon

17
SERC Generation Development Survey

• SERC Generation Development survey accurately
  projects actual generation development for the
  following year
• Survey reflects recent decline in proposed
  generation capacity additions
• Survey projects generation capacity additions of
  73,000 MW over the next 10 years
• Projected capacity additions for the same period
  have declined by 61 in the past year
• Network resource additions continue to be a small
  percentage of the projected capacity additions in
  the Region

18
SERC Transmission Development Survey

• Second annual survey
• Survey request sent in late January
• Information requested from Transmission Providers
• All results received by early March

Leading the Industry!!!
19
SERC Transmission Development Survey

• Requests total planned transmission expenditures
• 5 years of cost data
• 100 kV and above
• Requests aggregate data for transmission
  projects, only
• New lines
• New substations
• Line rebuilds
• Substation rebuilds
• Line reconductoring projects
• Excludes distribution station costs
• Results available on a Regional and subregional
  basis

20
Transmission Development Expenditures- Projected
2002 versus Actual 2002 -
21
Transmission Development Expenditures- Projected
2002 versus Projected 2003 -
22
Survey Result Comparisons- Total Projected
Expenditures -
2002 Survey Results
Total Projected Transmission Expenditures Over
the Subsequent Five Years
6.932 Billion
2003 Survey Results
Total Projected Transmission Expenditures Over
the Subsequent Five Years
6.265 Billion
23
Survey Result Comparisons- Cumulative Annual
Expenditures -
24
SERC Transmission Development Survey
2003 Survey Results
Total Projected Transmission Expenditures Over
the Subsequent Five Years
6,265 Million
2003 Survey Results
Of the Total Projected Expenditures Over the
Subsequent Five Years, Amount Attributed to
Direct Interconnection of Generation
191 Million
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
SERC Transmission Development Survey

• Actual spending in 2002 fell short of projected
  spending acquired from last years survey
• Cancellation of generation may have contributed
  to a portion of the decline
• Shortfall was minimal, indicating real spending
  has been occurring on the SERC transmission
  systems
• Projected spending for next five years (beginning
  in 2003) is slightly below five-year projected
  spending from 2002
• 2003 survey projected spending correlates well
  with 2002 actual spending