Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)

Description:

These processes are set into motion at the time of the experience. ... Morris and colleagues (1977) performed a study in which participants studied ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:145
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: bayc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)


1
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Overview
  • Memory is generally believed to rely upon three
    major processes
  • Encoding
  • Consolidation
  • Retrieval
  • This lecture will focus on LTM. By this I mean
    the retrieval of information from an experience
    long after that experience has passed

2
LTM
Implicit Memory
Explicit Memory
Priming
Nonassociative Learning
Neocortex
Reflex Pathways
Facts (Semantic Memory)
Events (Episodic Memory)
Skills and Habits
Simple Classical Conditioning
Striatum
Medial Temporal Lobe
Emotional Response
Skeletal Musculature
Amygdala
Cerebellum
Squire and Knowlton (1994) Squire (1987)
Declarative vs. procedural memory
3
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Multiple memory systems perspective
  • Long-term memory consists of all the different
    types of memory shown in the previous slide
  • Explicit (declarative) memory refers to memory
    that can be declared or described to other people
  • It includes episodic memory, memory for events in
    our personal past. Episodic memories are
    temporally dated, spatially located, and
    personally experience
  • semantic memory, our general knowledge about
    things in the world

4
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Multiple memory systems perspective
  • Implicit (nondeclarative) memory refers to
    nonconscious forms of memory that are indirectly
    expressed as changes in behavior
  • As shown in slide there are a variety of
    different types of implicit memory that are
    implemented in different brain regions

5
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • The story of HM
  • HM had epileptic seizures that could not be
    controlled by medications
  • At the age of 27 he had surgery to remove site
    thought to be source of seizures
  • Surgery removed hippocampus, amygdala, and much
    of the surrounding medial temporal lobe
  • HMs STM and working memory intact
  • HM has relatively intact memory for information
    learned well before surgery language intact
    (semantic memory intact) and has memory for
    experiences that occurred prior to surgery

6
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory
(LTM)
  • HM
  • HM has an anterograde amnesia. That is, HM cannot
    remember new events that he experienced after his
    surgery
  • Anterograde amnesia is global that is he cannot
    remember new events regardless of their content
    or modality
  • HM also has impaired semantic memory for new
    facts (e.g., flower child was thought by him to
    be a child who grows flowers)
  • In other words HMs episodic and semantic memory
    is impaired
  • Long-term memory consists of all the different
    types of memory shown in the previous slide
  • Explicit (declarative) memory refers to memory
    that can be declared or described to other people
  • It includes episodic memory, memory for events in
    our personal past. Episodic memories are
    temporally dated, spatially located, and
    personally experience
  • semantic memory, our general knowledge about
    things in the world

7
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Multiple memory systems perspective
  • HM also has a retrograde amnesia that is, he
    forgets events that occurred prior to surgery
  • His retrograde amnesia is temporally graded The
    closer the event to surgery the less likely he is
    able to recall it
  • This finding suggests that the medial temporal
    lobes are not always required to retrieve
    memories (One possibility is that some process
    occurs that makes it possible to retrieve
    information that does not rely on medial temporal
    lobes)
  • Long-term memory consists of all the different
    types of memory shown in the previous slide
  • Explicit (declarative) memory refers to memory
    that can be declared or described to other people
  • It includes episodic memory, memory for events in
    our personal past. Episodic memories are
    temporally dated, spatially located, and
    personally experience
  • semantic memory, our general knowledge about
    things in the world

8
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Multiple memory systems perspective
  • In 1962 Milner and colleagues showed that HM
    improved on tasks requiring skilled movements
  • HMs improvement was comparable to controls
  • Skill was called mirror tracing because it
    requires participants to draw the outline of a
    star while looking at the reflection of his hand
    and the star on the mirror
  • HM from had no conscious recollection of having
    done this task in the past
  • This is now viewed as a form of non-declarative
    or implicit memory tasks

9
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Multiple memory systems perspective
  • Other forms of implicit memory include priming
    effects that were reported by Warrington
    Weiskrantz (1968)
  • In this study amnesics shown list of words (e.g.,
    absent) at test participants were given word
    stem completion task (e.g., abs_____), and
    instructed to complete with first word that comes
    to mind
  • Results showed that amnesics (and controls) were
    more likely to complete word stems with
    previously studied words

10
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Multiple memory systems perspective
  • How episodic memories are formed?
  • Encoding refers to the processes by which
    information is transformed into a memory
    representation
  • These processes are set into motion at the time
    of the experience. One way to investigate
    encoding processes is to identify ways in which
    those processes can be affected.

11
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Multiple memory systems perspective
  • Elaboration of the meaning of incoming
    information refers to interpreting that
    information and connecting it with other
    information (this process has been shown to
    involve frontal lobes)
  • Thus, it appears that medial temporal lobes
    (amnesics) and frontal lobes appear to affect in
    episodic encoding of information

12
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Role of attention
  • Craik and many other investigators have shown
    that dividing attention at encoding plays an
    important role in subsequent memory performance
  • Participants were presented 15 words auditorily
    presented under one of two conditions.
  • Full attention. Words were presented by themselves

13
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Role of attention
  • Divided attention. As words were presented
    participants had to perform an attention-demanding
    secondary task (monitor position of asterisk on
    a computer screen
  • Results. Participants remembered 15 words in the
    full attention condition and 9 words in the
    divided attention condition
  • Shallice and colleagues (1994, Nature) have shown
    that left frontal lobe appears to play an
    important role in the encoding of episodic verbal
    information in a PET study

14
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Levels of processing
  • Craik and Lockhart (1975) proposed that memory
    for material will depend upon aspects of the
    stimulus that are attended to
  • shallow aspects of the stimulus may be the
    structure of the word, somewhat deeper aspects
    of the stimulus may be the sound of the word, and
    deeper aspects the meaning of the word

15
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Levels of processing
  • Craik and Tulving (1975) performed an experiment
    in which participants made 1 of 3 decisions about
    a word structuralupper or lower case letters
    phonologicalword rhymed with target word
    meaningword a member of a category
  • Participants were not told memory would be tested
    (called incidental learning)

16
Craik Tulving, 1975
17
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Levels of processing
  • Conclusions
  • Note memory performance appears to be a
    byproduct performing a task because participants
    were not directed to learn
  • Memory performance is also strongly affected by
    task being performed
  • Limitation no independent way of measuring depth
    of processing

18
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Transfer appropriate processing
  • Morris and colleagues (1977) performed a study in
    which participants studied words about which they
    had to make a semantic or rhyme judgment
  • At test, in the standard condition, participants
    had to decide whether or not the word had been
    studied in the rhyme condition, participants had
    to decide whether a studied word rhymed with the
    presented word

19
Morris et al. 1977
20
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Transfer appropriate processing
  • Conclusion
  • The processing at encoding is effective to the
    extent that the processing at encoding overlaps
    with the processing at retrieval
  • This is called transfer appropriate processing
  • Tulving and Thomson (1973) formulated a similar
    idea that they called the encoding specificity
    principle the degree to which an item will be
    remembered depends upon the similarity between
    the way the stimulus was processed at encoding
    and at retrieval

21
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Semantic elaboration and encoding
  • Studies have measured brain activity of
    participants while encoding words under semantic
    or perceptual conditions (e.g., Gabrieli et. al.
    1996)
  • These studies have shown that the left inferior
    frontal cortex and left medial temporal lobes are
    more activated under semantic than perceptual
    conditions

22
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Semantic elaboration and encoding
  • Wagner et al. (1998) performed an fMRI study in
    which participants were scanned as they made
    semantic judgments about words
  • Memory for words was tested and then was
    correlated with fMRI encoding data
  • Analyses showed greater activation of the left
    inferior frontal lobe cortex and left inferior
    medial temporal lobe for words that were recalled
    compared to words that were not recalled

23
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Generation and spacing
  • Generation effect. Demonstrated by Slamecka and
    Graf (1978)
  • In this exp. Participants in the read condition
    read pairs of words and made a synonym (e.g.,
    unhappy sad) or a rhyme (e.g., pad sad)
    decision. In the generate condition, they
    generated a synonym (e.g., unhappy s___) or a
    rhyme (e.g., pad s__)

24
Slamecka and Graf (1978)
25
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Generation effect
  • Results showed better memory for generated
    material than read material, and better memory
    for more semantically processed material
  • Why should this effect be obtained? Generation
    requires elaboration, and it requires attention
  • Support for this finding comes from a study,
    which showed that the left frontal region is more
    activated when material is generated versus read

26
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Spacing effect
  • A great many studies have shown that learning and
    remembering occurs more efficiently if the
    learning trials are distributed (or spaced)
    compared to being massed (i.e., presented one
    after another)
  • Why is distributed practice better?
  • Several possible reasons less attention context
    changed when presentation spaced, and hence
    probably a more elaborated memory trace

27
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Episodic encoding and binding and temporal lobes
  • It is generally believed that episodic encoding
    is the binding together of various features of a
    stimulus into an integrated memory representation
  • For example, if are shown an object, you will
    remember its shape, size, color, weight, tactile
    characteristics, etc. to a varying degree

28
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Episodic encoding and binding and temporal lobes
  • It is hypothesized the medial temporal lobe is
    responsible for binding these features into an
    integrated memory trace
  • That is, the medial temporal lobe receives highly
    processed input from many brain areas when an
    event is encoded
  • The medial temporal lobe is then responsible for
    binding together this input at encoding

29
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Episodic encoding and binding and temporal lobes
  • At retrieval, a retrieval cue is encoded. This
    retrieval cue typically consists of some of the
    input that was processed during encoding
  • The processed retrieval cue converges on the
    medial temporal lobe, it triggers pattern
    completion in the hippocampus, and this in turn
    reactivates information in the lateral cortex

30
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Episodic retrieval
  • Episodic retrieval refers to the processes by
    which stored memory traces are retrieved
  • It is generally assumed that retrieval produces
    the subjective experience of consciously
    remembering the past
  • Episodic retrieval is assumed to depend on medial
    temporal lobe that support pattern completion and
    the frontal lobes that support strategic
    retrieval

31
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Episodic retrieval
  • Implications of the retrieval model just
    presented
  • The process here means that there are multiple
    routes or ways in which a retrieval cue can
    access memory trace, and partial information may
    be enough to access memory trace
  • Episodic retrieval is assumed to depend on medial
    temporal lobe that support pattern completion and
    the frontal lobes that support strategic
    retrieval

32
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Episodic retrieval
  • Importance of hippocampus during retrieval of
    episodes supported by finding that hippocampus
    was activated during successful retrieval but not
    during unsuccessful retrieval (Eldridge, 2000,
    Nature Neuroscience)

33
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Episodic retrieval
  • Although encoding and retrieval are similar in
    many respects in this model, it has been proposed
    that one difference is that during encoding
    processed information from lateral cortex
    converges to hippocampus, whereas during
    retrieval the partial cue connects with stored
    memory trace, and this then projects back to
    lateral cortex

34
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Episodic retrieval
  • There is also evidence for the hypothesis that
    retrieval of episodes from memory will
    re-activate those regions of the cortex that were
    activated during encoding of the event
  • In an fMRI experiment participants were presented
    words paired with sounds or with pictures at
    retrieval participants were presented words and
    were required to remember whether sound or
    picture paired with words (Wheeler and Buckner,
    2001)

35
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Role of recollection and familiarity in retrieval
  • Behavioral data strongly suggest that recognition
    memory can proceed through recollection and
    through familiarity
  • Recollectionyou remember contextual details
  • Familiarity sense of having encountered stimulus
    in past in absence of recollection
  • Dual-process theories of recognition assert that
    both types of recognition normally occur

36
Encoding and Retrieval from long-term memory (LTM)
  • Role of recollection and familiarity in retrieval
  • For example, it has been shown that recollection
    is a slower process than familiarity (e.g.,
    Yonelinas, 2002)
  • Dividing attention seems to affect more strongly
    recollection than familiarity
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com