Flashbulb Memory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Flashbulb Memory

Description:

Flashbulb memory Originally described ... nothing different about them E.g Neisser himself was sure he was listening to the baseball when pearl harbour was bombed ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:125
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: Samm177
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Flashbulb Memory


1
Flashbulb Memory
  • IB Syllabus Says
  • Evaluate one theory of how emotion may affect one
    cognitive process
  • (i.e. How flashbulb memory theory explains the
    influence of emotion on memory )

2
Flashbulb memory
  • Originally described by Brown Kulik (1977)
  • Exceptionally vivid memories
  • Usually of important events with emotional
    significance
  • Resistant to forgetting over time
  • Debate centres on whether they are a special
    case, or the same as other memories

3
Flashbulb memory
  • Typical flashbulb events are dramatic,
    unexpected, shocking
  • E.g. disasters, deaths of prominent figures (esp.
    if unexpected), momentous events
  • World Trade Centre
  • Kennedy, Princess Diana
  • Fall of Berlin Wall

4
Flashbulb memoryThese are the aspects that
Brown and Kulick (1977) propose are remembered
vividly for flashbulb memories
  • Where you were
  • What you were doing
  • How you were informed
  • How you reacted
  • How others around you reacted
  • They propose that there is a biological memory
    mechanism which leads to these exceptionally
    vivid memories

5
Flashbulb memory
  • Surveys about dramatic events
  • Brown Kulik (1977) found US PPs tended to have
    vivid memories of political assassinations
  • All PPs good recall of Kennedy, Black PPs better
    recall of Medgar Evers (civil rights worker)
  • Shows importance of relevance of the information
    culture seems to influence things
  • Shock, arousal also important (physiological
    arousal amygdala)

6
  • Neisser (1982) proposed that the enduring nature
    of FBM is a result of rehearsal and reworking
    after the event
  • We use the conventions of storytelling recounting
    important events FBMs are just as susceptible
    to distortion as other memories.
  • Its difficult to check the accuracy of flashbulb
    memories nothing different about them
  • E.g Neisser himself was sure he was listening to
    the baseball when pearl harbour was bombed in
    WWII but it couldnt have been possible because
    it wasnt in the baseball season

7
Flashbulb memory
  • Challenges to concept of FBM
  • Neisser Harsch (1992) compared PPs recall of
    Challenger disaster after 24 hours and 2 years
  • Found all accounts had changed over time, some
    were wildly inaccurate 40

8
  • Furthermore, The McCloskey et al. (1988) study
    also proposes that flashbulb memories are not
    special memories (see key study)

9
Flashbulb memory
  • Platania Hertkorn (1998) recall for death of
    Princess Diana

10
Flashbulb memory
  • Squire (2000) recall of OJ Simpson verdict

100 50 0
1 mo 12 mo 15 mo 3 years
11
Flashbulb memories
  • Relatively little evidence for FMBs as a distinct
    memory process
  • They feel accurate (we are confident in recall)
    but are just as prone to forgetting change as
    other episodic memories
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com