ASAS%20Thematic%20Network%20First%20Workshop%20Outcome - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

ASAS%20Thematic%20Network%20First%20Workshop%20Outcome

Description:

... applications enabled by ADS-B. Key Players expectations. ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malm . WS1 Structure. Day 2. Benefits. Cost/implications ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: euroco
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ASAS%20Thematic%20Network%20First%20Workshop%20Outcome


1
ASAS Thematic NetworkFirst Workshop Outcome
  • Eric Hoffman
  • 6-8th October Malmö

2
WS 1 Overview
  • ASAS Operational improvements
  • Dream or Reality?
  • Roma, 28th to 30th 2003
  • 63 Attendees
  • Report published June 28th 2003

3
WS 1 Structure
  • Day 1
  • Welcome
  • ASAS TN Overview
  • Workshop Objectives
  • Operational applications enabled by ADS-B
  • Key Players expectations

4
WS1 Structure
  • Day 2
  • Benefits
  • Cost/implications
  • Impact
  • Inter-operation and Safety
  • Day 3
  • Wrap up

5
Plenary Session
  • What are the expectations from the main players?
  • Chris North (EC DGTREN)
  • Pieter van der Kraan (EUROCONTROL)
  • Nicolas Zveguintzoff (IATA)
  • Bo Redeborn (LFV)

6
Plenary Session
  • Need to get airports and airlines more involved.
  • Get full commitment
  • Implementation time lines are too long.
  • Too many things are going on separately.
  • USA/European cooperation RD sufficient?

7
Benefits
  • Operational needs, lessons learned, expected
    benefits, overall maturity and potential
    implementation timeframe.
  • Juergen Lauterbach (Lufthansa)
  • Graeme Clark (Easyjet)
  • Pedro Rastrilla (AENA)
  • Alain Printemps (CENA)

8
Benefits
  • A large number of potential benefits were
    identified
  • ASAS Spacing most promising application for the
    short term
  • Airport enhanced surveillance could improve the
    safety and efficiency.
  • A number of concerns were highlighted
  • Sharing of responsibilities, Controller
    acceptability, Safety Case
  • Need for reference operational concepts
  • Competing enabling technologies (1090 vs. VDL
    Mode 4)
  • Business case paramount

9
Costs/Implications
  • Implications of ASAS applications on ground/
    airborne systems, training communication,
    infrastructure, and the associated costs.
  • Pieter van der Kraan (EUROCONTROL)
  • Peter Howlett (THALES ATM)
  • Thomas Fixy (Airbus)
  • Patrick Souchu (DGAC)

10
Costs/Implications
  • Early implementation is essential
  • Further work is needed for Standards and CBA
  • We should mandate Package 1 and focus on subset
    Application to reduce timetable
  • 1090ES is not the answer but is going to happen,
    a study for the up-link is needed

11
Impact
  • Expected impact of ASAS on workload, safety, and
    responsibility for the human operators
  • Uwe Kroger (IFALPA and VC)
  • Anthony Smoker (IFATCA)
  • Bengt Moberg (SAS)
  • Roberto Barchitta (Alitalia)

12
Impact
  • Lack of knowledge concerning what ASAS
  • Willingness to be involved by IFALPA, IFATCA and
    ATCEU
  • Trust - both technical and managerial issues
  • Package 1 may not be ambitious enough/ paradigm
    shift
  • Learn from experience in parallel worlds and
    use the safety case

13
Inter-operation / Safety
  • Change the environment, delays, standards,
    military, ATC sectors, single sky. Transition
    aspects. Mix equipage environment. Time scales.
    Interoperability
  • Alberto Pasquini (Deep Blue)
  • Jose Roca (EUROCONTROL)
  • Ronald van Gent (NLR)
  • Martin Robinson- (IAOPA)

14
Inter-operation / Safety
  • General
  • Need to disseminate/coordinate better
  • Still a need to avoid the capacity gridlock
  • Maturity
  • Validation required
  • Integration with existing systems
  • Mixed equipage
  • Equipage rate
  • Transition
  • Mandate
  • Safety benefits
  • Mode S elementary surveillance
  • Incentive

15
Conclusions
  • Need for agreement and commitment from the
    various stakeholders
  • Package 1 definition exists but fragile
  • Need for pilot and controller acceptability
  • Need for agreed standards for interoperability
  • Need for a clear implementation plan
  • Need for improved exchange of information
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com