Avanceret udredning af urininkontinens - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Avanceret udredning af urininkontinens

Description:

BD har endnu ikke klare indikationer ved udredning af non-neurogen urininkontinens bortset fra m ling af PVR ANDET URODYNAMICS ideally should provide ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:127
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: lbon
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Avanceret udredning af urininkontinens


1
Avanceret udredning af urininkontinens
  • Mette Hornum Bing
  • Lene Birgitte Paulsen
  • Helle Christina Sørensen
  • Helga M E Gimbel
  • Susanne Greisen
  • Gunnar Lose (tovholder)

Gynækologiske Guidelines Hindsgavl 2010
2
  • The bladder is an unreliable witness

Stanton 1984
3
URODYNAMICS
  • Studies provide an objective describtion
  • of lower urinary tract function and
  • dysfunction in terms of qualitative and
  • quantitative variables

ICI 2005
4
URODYNAMICS
  • The study of the function and dysfunction of
    the urinary tract by any appropriate method
  • non-invasive
  • invasive

ICS 1988
5
URODYNAMICS
  • Urodynamic studies should be performed and
    reported in accordance with the standards (good
    urodynamic practices) of the ICS

ICS 2005
6
FLOW og RESIDUALURIN (PVR)
  • Simpel non-invasive undersøgelser
  • (screening?)
  • Flow og/eller PVR prædikterer voiding
  • difficulties efter kirurgi (antimuscarin
  • behandling?)
  • Screening? (ønske objektiv diagnose)
  • Flow PVR anbefales før intervention
  • (specielt kirurgi) (C)

7
CYSTOMETRI og TRYK-FLOW
  • Invasiv kræver ekspertise
  • SUI omkring 10 har DO
  • OAB 50 DO
  • MUI 30-50 har urodynamisk MUI
  • Cystometri (B/C)
  • er ikke nødvendig, hvis konservativ behandling
    påtænkes uanset
  • dysfunktionens karakter (MUI, SUI eller UUI)
  • hos kvinder med ren stressinkontinens, og normal
    uroflowmetri og
  • residualurin er cystometri ikke nødvendig
    forud for operation
  • Tryk-flow anvendes til at afgøre, om voiding
    difficulties
  • skyldes a) obstruktion eller b) hypoaktiv
    detrusor

8
URETHRAL TRYK
  • Invasiv (ikke standardiseret)
  • Alle parametre viser stor overlap mellem raske og
    syge
  • Lave værdier (LPP lt 60 cm H2O og MUCP lt 20 cm
    H2O) er correleret til dårligere outcome af
    kirurgisk behandling
  • Det kan ikke anbefales, at urethraltrykmåling
    anvendes som eneste urodynemiske test hos
    patienter med urininkontinens (B/C).

9
BILLEDDIAGNOSTIK
  • Der er ikke indikation for BD af øvre urinveje
    ved non-neurogen inkontinens
  • PVR kan måles ved abdominal, vaginal eller
    transperineal UL
  • Blærevægstykkelse gt5 mm er correleret til DO
  • BD har endnu ikke klare indikationer ved
    udredning af non-neurogen urininkontinens bortset
    fra måling af PVR

10
RISIKOFAKTORER VED MIDURETHRAL SLYNGER
  • CURE RATE
  • Alder (de novo urgency)
  • BMI (gt 35)
  • Tidligere operation for inkontinens
  • MUI
  • DO
  • BN mobilitet
  • ISD (LPP lt 60 cm H2O, MUCP lt 20 cm H2O) (TVT v.
    TO?)
  • VOIDING DIFFICULTIES
  • PVR
  • Q-max (TO-TVT)

TVT v TO
11
KONKLUSION (B/C)
  • Screening? (ønske objektiv diagnose)
  • Flow PVR anbefales før intervention (specielt
    kirurgi)
  • Cystometri
  • er ikke nødvendig, hvis konservativ behandling
    påtænkes uanset
  • dysfunktionens karakter (MUI, SUI eller UUI)
  • hos kvinder med ren stressinkontinens, og normal
    uroflowmetri og
  • residualurin er cystometri ikke nødvendig forud
    for operation
  • Tryk-flow anvendes til at afgøre, om voiding
    difficulties
  • skyldes a) obstruktion eller b) hypoaktiv
    detrusor
  • Det kan ikke anbefales, at urethraltrykmåling
    anvendes som eneste urodynemiske test hos
    patienter med urininkontinens.
  • BD har endnu ikke klare indikationer ved
    udredning af non-neurogen urininkontinens bortset
    fra måling af PVR

12
ANDET
13
URODYNAMICS
  • ideally should provide objective information
    useful for the clinician
  • to identify or to rule out factors contributing
    to the incontinence and assess their relative
    importance
  • to obtain information about other aspects of
    lower urinary tract dysfunction
  • to predict the consequences of lower urinary
    tract dysfunction for the upper urinary tract
  • to predict the outcome, including undesirable
    side effects, of a contemplated treatment
  • to confirm the effects of intervention or
    understand the mode of action of a particular
    type of treatment, especially a new one
  • to understand the reasons for failure of previous
    treatments for incontinence

ICS 2005
14
Recommendations 1
  • When invasive urodynamics is needed, a tailored
    evaluation of all factors is required
  • symptoms, diary, non-invasive and invasive
    urodynamics
  • filling and voiding
  • bladder and urethra
  • may need videourodynamics (imaging) or EMG
  • Should be performed in specialized centers
  • accredited urodynamics laboratory
  • trained and certified staff
  • results controlled for quality
  • Proper training, accreditation, certification and
    quality-control programs required (Grade C)

ICI 05
15
Recommendations 2
  • Noninvasive urodynamic testing is recommended in
    every case (grade C)
  • bladder diary, PVR, uroflow
  • If any suggestion of complication
  • Tailored, invasive urodynamics is required
  • To show if situation truly is complicated
  • To reveal all contributory factors
  • To provide basis of rational treatment choice
  • Only in simple situations
  • Invasive urodynamics not required
  • e.g. uncomplicated stress and urge incontinence

ICI 05
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com