Organisationspsychologie Philipps-Universit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Organisationspsychologie Philipps-Universit

Description:

Tree planter: Maintain retention; motivate task behaviour ... Tree planter: Turnover per season 10 %; overall production 200 trees/h ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:167
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: wisone
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Organisationspsychologie Philipps-Universit


1
MOS 342B Section 002 Winter 2007 Compensation
and Benefits Management Formulating the
Compensation Strategy
2
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Overview
  • Constraints on Compensation
  • Steps in Formulating the Strategy
  • Define required behaviour
  • Define role of compensation
  • Determine compensation mix
  • Determine compensation level
  • Evaluate strategy
  • Specific Employee Groups

3
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Constraints on Compensation Strategy
  • Issues considered so far
  • Strategic organizational context
  • Employee behaviour and motivation
  • Options of compensation mix
  • Refers to where we want to arrive at
  • But how far can we get?
  • Legal constraints
  • Labour market constraints
  • Product/service market constraints
  • Financial constraints of the organization

4
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Legal Constraints
  • Legal constraints in Canada
  • Federal law (e.g., Human Rights Act, Standards of
    Labour)
  • Provincial laws (e.g., Provincial Human Rights
    Acts, Employment Standards Acts)
  • Types of Legislation
  • Employment Standards
  • Human Rights
  • Trade Union
  • Taxation

5
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Legal Constraints
  • Employment Standards Legislation that sets
    minimum standards for pay and other conditions of
    employment such as hours of work, vacation,
    statutory holiday, etc.
  • Minimum pay ( 8.00/h in Ontario)
  • Does not apply to contractors
  • Higher for overtime work

6
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Legal Constraints
  • Human Rights Acts Legislation that prohibits
    discrimination in hiring or employment on the
    basis of race, ethnic origin, religion, gender,
    marital status, age
  • 1987 Ontario introduced equal pay for work of
    equal value
  • Companies are required to base payment on job
    evaluation

7
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Legal Constraints
  • Trade Union Legislation Legislation that defines
    the rights of parties involved in a collective
    bargaining relationship
  • Tax Legislation
  • Favours indirect pay and stock plans
  • More tax deductions for contractors

8
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Other Constraints
  • Labour Market Constraints flowing from the
    relative levels of demand and supply for
    particular occupational groups
  • How to handle in geographically dispersed
    companies?
  • Product/Service Market Constraints on
    compensation strategy caused by the nature of the
    product or service market in which the firm
    operates
  • Competitiveness, volatility
  • Financial Constraints Profits, Cash-Flow

9
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Formulating the Compensation Strategy

Define the Required Behaviour
Define the Role of Compensation
Determine the Compensation Mix
Determine the Compensation Level
Evaluate the Proposed Strategy
10
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Defining Required Behaviours
  • Task Behaviour Dimensions
  • Simple vs. complex
  • Narrow vs. broad
  • Errors uncritical vs. critical
  • Independent vs. interdependent output
  • Impact of individual on organizational
    performance
  • Off-task Behaviour
  • Citizenship Importance of cooperation,
    suggestions, etc.
  • Counterproductive behaviour Expected damage
  • Costs of turnover (recruitment, training,
    customer and employee satisfaction)

11
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Defining Required Behaviours
  • Characteristics HR managers think applicants
    consider
  • Career advancement opportunities
  • Compensation plan/level
  • Company reputation
  • Management/leadership style
  • Corporate culture
  • Profitability
  • Findings from more elaborate studies
  • Job security may be more important than revealed
    in surveys
  • Different applicants have different preferences,
    strategies
  • Importance of perceived fit, first contact
    (interview), etc.

12
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Defining the Role of Compensation
  • Q How important is compensation within the mix
    of rewards to generate desired behaviours?
  • Analyze impact of reward components on behaviour
    components for
  • Production-line worker
  • Tree planter
  • Design engineer

13
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Defining the Role of Compensation
  • Define behavioural objectives
  • Production-line Attract sufficient number of
    applicants
  • Tree planter Maintain retention motivate task
    behaviour
  • Design engineer Attract qualified applicants
    promote creativity, OCB, skill development
  • Find and define measurable indicators for
    behavioural objectives
  • Production-line 50 more applications than
    turnover
  • Tree planter Turnover per season lt 10 overall
    production gt 200 trees/h
  • Design engineer Acceptance rate of job offers gt
    75 of design awards, suggestions, successful
    trainings

14
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Determining the Compensation Mix
  • Q How can components of compensation mix be
    combined to achieve behavioural objectives?
  • Example Design engineer
  • Recruiting/retaining qualified engineers base
    pay, stock plans
  • Promote creativity targeted bonus (group or
    individual)
  • Promote OCB group performance pay, targeted
    bonus, profit sharing
  • Promote learning benefits (course
    reimbursement), PKS

15
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Determining the Compensation Level
  • Q How much compensation should be offered
    overall?
  • Two important considerations
  • Legal, market, and financial constraints
  • Utility of expected outcomes
  • Three general policies
  • Lag compensation Payment below job market level
    to safe costs
  • Lead compensation Payment above market level to
    improve performance
  • Match compensation Payment at market level to
    reduce effects of uncertainty about outcomes
    (best guess)

16
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Determining the Compensation Level
  • Utility (of Compensation) Analysis Defining the
    range of expected financial effects of changes in
    level of compensation
  • Determine current revenue and personnel costs
  • Identify the range and size of possible effects
    of changes (direct and indirect pay, turnover and
    replacement costs, productivity, soft criteria
    like customer and employee satisfaction, context
    factors)
  • Combine criteria and individual parameters in a
    formula
  • ?U (? revenue components) (? cost
    components)
  • Estimate expected changes for a range of
    scenarios and time periods
  • Compare and decide

17
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Evaluating the Proposed Strategy
  • Preliminary review of how well the strategy
    serves compensation purposes or goals (cf. LONG,
    p.9)
  • Bottle-neck or no go criteria (must be met)
  • Affordability
  • Legality
  • Minimum applicant attraction
  • Desired effects
  • Fit with managerial strategy and organizational
    culture
  • Promote desired behaviour
  • Equity
  • Cost-effectiveness

18
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Case Study Fit Stop Ltd.
  • CEO Susan Superfit hired you to formulate a
    compensation strategy for her firm. Using the
    5-step process, formulate such a strategy and
    summarize the compensation mix by assigning
    percentages to each component. Give your
    rationale for each element of the strategy.

19
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Specific Employee Groups
  • Hybrid approaches Different systems for specific
    groups
  • Can be considered for functional groups (e.g.,
    production, clerical, managerial, professional),
    hierarchical levels, regions, etc.
  • Most common specifically compensated groups
  • Contingent workers
  • New employees
  • Expatriates and foreign employees
  • Executives

20
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Contingent Workers
  • Workers not employed on a permanent, (full-time)
    basis
  • Proportion of new employees hired into temporary
    work doubled between 1989 and 2004 (now at 21 )
  • Two different groups
  • Professionals or specialists only needed for a
    specified project (-gt acquiring special
    expertise)
  • Contingent workers doing similar work as regular
    employees (-gt flexibility in dealing with demand
    fluctuations)
  • Other reasons for contingent work
  • Screening for regular employment
  • Legal constraints (employment standards) do not
    apply to contract workers, and benefits not to
    contingent workers
  • Buffering core employees

21
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • New Employees
  • Two-tier wage system Pay system in which new
    employees are subject to a different (lower) pay
    structure than existing employees
  • Objective Establishing a lower overall pay level
  • Problems
  • May cause resistance and dissatisfaction in the
    high-tier
  • New hires feel as second-class citizens
  • May be illegal on a permanent basis

22
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Expatriates and Foreign Employees
  • Expatriates Employees sent to foreign country
    for a longer period of time
  • Foreign employees Local citizens hired by an
    internationally operating company
  • Compensation models for expatriates
  • Balance sheet Expatriate compensation that
    attempts to provide a standard of living
    comparable with the home country
  • Lump sum Payment of balance sheet components in
    home-country cash
  • Localization Payment according to local market
    compensation
  • Negotiation Individual agreement on acceptable
    compensation package

23
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Executives
  • Some Figures on Executive Payment
  • In 2002, average payment of CEOs of major US
    corporations was 531 times the average pay of
    factory workers (1960 43 times)
  • Among the 10 highest-paid Canadian CEOs, base pay
    (salary) made up 2.3 of annual pay, whereas
    income from stock options amounted to 74
  • Payment in stock options is significantly related
    to company stock prices, but otherwise, executive
    pay components and indicators of company
    performance are unrelated
  • US 2005 Fortune 500 rankings
  • Highest-paid T.S. Semel (Yahoo) 230.6 Million
    -US
  • Best performer (6-year) R.K. Cole (NCF) 1.3
    Million -US
  • Worst performer (6-year) P. Cartwright
    (Calpine) 13 Million -US

24
MOS 342B Strategy Formulation
  • Executives
  • Problems with Executive Stock Options
  • Dilution of equity
  • Low employee morale
  • Incentive for short-term orientation, and even
    white-collar crime (see Enron example, p.225)
  • Alternatives to Executive Stock Options
  • Restricted stocks
  • Long-term incentives
  • Bonuses
  • Indirect pay (including golden parachute)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com